Arctic Melting as Europe Freezes. Where Where Have I seen this Before? Oh, Yeah Science.

February 26, 2018

And, oh yeah, I’ve been bringing you those voices for years now, at this blog, thru these videos.
You’re welcome.

Hey, don’t get mad at me.

Andrew Freedman in Mashable:

There is growing scientific support for one of the most provocative and counterintuitive ideas in climate change research, which holds that rapid Arctic warming may be causing colder winters across large swaths of the Northern Hemisphere.

A new study, to be published in the journal Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,found that a weakening polar vortex, potentially set in motion by the rapidly warming and melting Arctic, has become more common during the past four decades. This results in colder winters across large regions of Europe and Russia, but also occasionally in the U.S. as well.

The study is the first to show that changes in winds in the stratosphere substantially contributed to a mysterious winter cooling trend in northern Europe and Asia, including a region already known for being frigid: Siberia.

The study, written by a group of European and American researchers, found that a weakening in the wintertime polar vortex can explain 60 percent of the observed cooling in Eurasia since 1990. That figure increases to 80 percent if other influences on winter weather, including El Niño events, are also included.

“In winter, the freezing Arctic air is normally ‘locked’ by strong circumpolar winds several tens of kilometers high in the atmosphere, known as the stratospheric polar vortex, so that the cold air is confined near the pole,” said study co-author Marlene Kretschmer from the Potsdam Institute of Climate Impacts Research in Germany, in a press release.

“We found that there’s a shift towards more-persistent weak states of the polar vortex. This allows frigid air to break out of the Arctic and threaten Russia and Europe with cold extremes.”

Freedman again:

The polar vortex probably isn’t quite what you think it is.

It’s not some sort of giant whirlpool in the sky. Nor is it something that can suck you in, like a massive, frigid tornado, rotating above the entire Arctic in a scene akin to the instant freeze of New York City during the film The Day After Tomorrow.

Instead, you can think of the polar vortex as a circular air current that exists at two levels of the atmosphere, one in the troposphere, where most weather occurs, and the other a bit higher up, in the stratosphere. The new study deals with the stratospheric polar vortex.

When the stratospheric polar vortex is strong, the study found, it tends to bottle up the cold air in the Arctic, making northern midlatitudes from Canada to Europe and Eurasia milder than average. A strong polar vortex means that the winds blowing from west to east at high altitudes across the Arctic are more powerful than when the vortex slackens and meanders.

When the vortex weakens, as it did during the infamous winter of 2012-2013, and several winters since, the ultra-cold air can spill out of the Arctic, as if someone opened the door to the planet’s freezer. Not surprisingly, this can lead to cold snaps and snowstorms along the U.S. East Coast, in Western Europe, as well as Eurasia.

Meanwhile, during such episodes the Arctic can be comparatively mild, leading scientists to call such patterns, “warm Arctic, cool continents” setups. These patterns occurred last winter, when several storms brought such mild air to the center of the Arctic Ocean that the North Pole reached near or above freezing for short periods of time.

During the past several years, scientists have been finding that the shape and strength of the stratospheric polar vortex is hugely important for determining what kind of winter weather will dominate large regions of the northern midlatitudes, particularly in Eurasia, which has been seeing a wintertime cooling trend overall.



7 Responses to “Arctic Melting as Europe Freezes. Where Where Have I seen this Before? Oh, Yeah Science.”

  1. pendantry Says:

    Reblogged this on Wibble and commented:
    For those of you not familiar with Peter Sinclair and his ‘Climate Denial Crock of the Week’ website, this is as good an introduction as any.

    If you’re where the ‘blue’ is: wrap up warm!

  2. Sir Charles Says:

    Hey thanks. I just was talking to my son in Germany about the reason for that cold snap where I sent him the link to an earlier article by Climatecrocks (Reposting: Arctic Science All-Stars Explain Polar Vortex). Now I can send him this article. Thanks again!

  3. dumboldguy Says:

    We have been watching the increasingly erratic behavior of the polar vortex for years now (and going ho-hum). Record high temperatures last week in the Washington DC and No VA area—-82-84 degrees in freaking February? After prolonged lows in January.

    Maybe we’ll really pay attention when these “warm spells” and “cold snaps” start to kill large numbers of people? (Oh wait, that HAS happened, along with 45,000 fruit bats in AUS and 100’s of thousands of taiga antelope, and…..)

  4. grindupbaker Says:

    I never found it counterintuitive as “Andrew Freedman” types because one of the earliest talks I listened to 5 years ago was Kevin Trenberth and he mentioned an humongous 6 petawatts is transferred by air currents (90%) and ocean currents (10%) from the tropics and sub-tropics to the mid/high northern latitudes. Irrespective of whether it relates to current events, the implication is obvious. Whatever portion of this heat is headed for the Arctic and sub-Arctic must pass over the temperate latitudes on the way so anything that reduces that heat transfer northward from the tropics and sub-tropics, such as perhaps a warming Arctic might do, can indeed cause a colder northern temperate region. I forget in which talk I saw the graph of distribution by latitude of that huge heat transfer but if I take the entire northern hemisphere north of 40N as an example for illustration of the quantity involved then that 6 petawatts averages to 66 w/m**2 over the entire northern hemisphere north of 40N and averaged 24/7 over a year. The Sun’s insolation averaged over a year over the northern hemisphere north of 40N is only ~177 w/m**2 (assuming typical global bulk albedo) so that’s a heat transfer by air and ocean currents that is 37% of the solar heating north of 40N. Any change to that could be a big overall change.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: