It’s More than Climate Denial. It’s Pathology
September 28, 2016
Donald Trump’s running mate is breaking with the Republican nominee’s claim that climate change is not the result of human activity.
Vice presidential nominee Mike Pence said Tuesday “there’s no question” that human activity affects both the climate and the environment.
At Monday’s presidential debate, Democrat Hillary Clinton challenged Trump’s views, saying: “Donald thinks that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. I think it’s real.” Trump interrupted with “I did not, I do not say that.”
But in 2012, Trump tweeted that the “concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.” He later claimed he was kidding, but he’s also repeated the assertion that climate change is a hoax benefiting China. And in 2014, Trump tweeted: “Snowing in Texas and Louisiana, record setting freezing temperatures throughout the country and beyond. Global warming is an expensive hoax!”
Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, tried to move discussion away from those comments Tuesday, saying on CNN that Trump believes “that climate change is naturally occurring” but the causes are not man-made.
The world’s scientific organizations say the Earth’s climate is changing because of the buildup of heat-trapping gases, especially carbon dioxide, from the burning of coal, oil and gas.
Pence, appearing separately on CNN, said, “let’s follow the science,” but he warned against rushing into environmental restrictions that drive jobs out of the country and put Americans out of work.
Below, more astounding examples of serious cognitive break in the republican establishment. Is this the real “neurological disorder” we should be concerned about?
I used to say that climate denial was perhaps a neurological disorder like Autism, but some readers pointed out to me that Autism is a spectrum, and often a characteristic of some very capable and productive citizens.
So, I’m thinking it’s more related to Zombies, parasitic brain worms, or brain eating amoebas. Fruitful area for research.
How can someone deny having said something with such conviction when there is readily available evidence that he did? This is the question The Huffington Post posed to several of Trump’s surrogates after the debate ended Monday night. Here are their explanations.
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.)
HUFFPOST: During the debate Donald Trump definitively said that he never once said that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. But here is a tweet where he says just that. [We attempt to show her the tweet.]
BLACKBURN: Well, I don’t have my glasses on.
HP: Come on! OK, I’ll read it. [We read it.]
BLACKBURN: Well, many times when we talk about issues related to the climate, y’all have countries that would not be forced to come into compliance with some of these agreements. Then they will say they don’t have to abide by that, they plan to buy more coal.
HP: Do you believe that climate change is a hoax?
BLACKBURN: I do not believe in climate change. I think the Earth is in a cooling trend. It is not in a warming trend.
HP: You currently think the Earth is in a cooling trend?
BLACKBURN: It is in a cooling trend. It has cooled for about the past 10 years. And the thing that is so interesting is that when you say global warming or climate change, the climate will change. So yes, in that, I agree that it does. You have to ask, “Is it cyclical?”
HP: You know we’ve had about nine of the hottest years in the history of the planet have been in the past 10 years?
BLACKBURN: We have also seen the past 10 years a little bit of a cooling.
Note: The idea that the Earth is cooling is wrong.
Trump aide Sarah Huckabee
HP: [Reads her Trump’s tweet.]
HUCKABEE: I think what he said was, he didn’t think global warming was the number one threat to the world.
HP: He said, “I never said that.”
HUCKABEE: I’m sorry. I stepped out a couple times. I really don’t know what you’re talking about on that. The only global warming comment I heard was there at the end.
HP: Does he still believe global warming is a hoax? You’re a surrogate, you’ve got to represent him.
HUCKABEE: I’m not him. I’m his surrogate.
Republican National Committee senior strategist Sean Spicer
HP: How does he say he never said climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese when there is this tweet?
SPICER: I didn’t follow that. I didn’t hear what actually happened.
HP: Does he still believe what he put in this tweet?
SPICER: I don’t know. You have to ask him.
Sen. David Purdue (R-Ga.)
HP: How do you square the statement from the debate with this tweet?
PURDUE: You’ll have to ask him that. What he is really talking about is how unrealistic her expectation of switching to global green energy overnight is.
HP: But as a surrogate for the campaign, is the campaign’s position that climate change is a hoax?
PURDUE: Well, talk to the campaign
HP: You’re with the campaign.
PURDUE: I understand that. Right now, it is not proven. There are controversies about that. There are experts on both sides that will take opposing views on that. And for us to take the entire direction of our country and sacrifice our economy and put millions of people out of work because of something that they, the Democrats, are perpetrating, I find really irresponsible.
Note: The vast majority of scientific experts believe that climate change is real and that human activity is contributing to it.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.)
HP: What do you make of him saying he never said that and the existence of this tweet?
SESSIONS: I’m not sure what he had in his mind when he said what he said. He has not been saying that recently. He has been respectful of it, but he does believe in all energy sources and many of those are CO2-producing energy sources.
HP: Is it the campaign’s belief that climate change is a hoax?
SESSIONS: Well, I’m going to tell you what I believe.
HP: But you’re here on the campaign’s behalf.
SESSIONS: I believe that we don’t need to be spending, making the taxpayers pay, much more money for their electricity from solar cells.
HP: But is it the campaign’s position that climate change is a hoax?
SESSIONS: No. I don’t think it is a hoax. What I say is climate change, the explanation the scientists gave for climate change, made some sense: that CO2 could be a greenhouse effect in causing the temperature to increase. However, 15 to 18 years have gone by and we haven’t seen anything like the predictions come true that they predicted.