The Weekend Wonk: Educating for Ignorance – It’s “School Choice” Week!

The video above contains some pieces from my video documenting the 2012 Heartland Institute Climate Conference in Chicago – including some clips that did not make the original cut.  I wanted originally to  spotlight Heartland’s focus on destroying the American Public School system, as you can see.

For the last 40 years, the ‘conservative” movement has attempted to further it’s ends by manipulating the most virulent, ignorant, and fanatical elements of the fundamentalist Christian right. We can see in today’s Republican party how well that strategy has worked out.  The same people think they can use the fanatical Christian right as a trojan horse – to move Anti science, Climate denial disinformation into the school system under the shadow of the “Teach the Controversy” Creationism movement.

It’s School Choice Week – celebrating the right of your children to be taught that the earth might be 5 billion, or 5000 years old, and to make up their own minds about the science.  They will also have the right to be taught that maybe the last 150 years of physics is wrong, heat seeking missiles don’t really seek heat, CO2 lasers don’t really lase, and heat trapping gases can’t really trap heat – that they should “think for themselves”, and, well, listen to Rush Limbaugh instead of the National Academy.

The celebration is supported by a rogues gallery of the usual suspect right wing think tanks, like the Heartland Institute, Cato,  Freedomworks, Americans for Prosperity, and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).  Why would a group of far right wing, mostly libertarian, Ayn Randian types be in bed with the tongue talkers and snake handlers of the creationist movement?

Chris Mooney in Slate:

All across the country—most recently, in the state of Texas—local battles over the teaching of evolution are taking on a new complexion. More and more, it isn’t just evolution under attack, it’s also the teaching of climate science. The National Center for Science Education, the leading group defending the teaching of evolution across the country, has even broadened its portfolio: Now it protects climate education too.

How did these issues get wrapped up together?
schoolchoic
There is the “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” theory. In other words, anti-evolutionists and climate deniers were both getting dumped on so much by the scientific community that they sort of naturally joined forces. And that makes sense: We know that in general, people gather their issue stances in bunches, because those stances travel together in a group (often under the aegis of a political party)
But there’s also the “declining trust in science” theory, according to which political conservatives have, in general, become distrustful of the scientific community (we have data showing this is the case), and this has infected how they think about several different politicized scientific issues. And who knows: Perhaps the distrust started with the evolution issue. It is easy to imagine how a Christian conservative who thinks liberal scientists are full of it on evolution would naturally distrust said scientists on other issues as well.
bookbig1small
United States History – Heritage of Freedom In Christian Perspective, Third Edition; A Beka Book, copyright 2009, Pensacola Christian College.

When public-school students enrolled in Texas’ largest charter program open their biology workbooks, they will read that the fossil record is “sketchy.” That evolution is “dogma” and an “unproved theory” with no experimental basis. They will be told that leading scientists dispute the mechanisms of evolution and the age of the Earth. These are all lies.

 The more than 17,000 students in the Responsive Education Solutions charter system will learn in their history classes that some residents of the Philippines were “pagans in various levels of civilization.” They’ll read in a history textbook that feminism forced women to turn to the government as a “surrogate husband.”

Responsive Ed has a secular veneer and is funded by public money, but it has been connected from its inception to the creationist movement and to far-right fundamentalists who seek to undermine the separation of church and state.

Infiltrating and subverting the charter-school movement has allowed Responsive Ed to carry out its religious agenda—and it is succeeding. Operating more than 65 campuses in Texas, Arkansas, and Indiana, Responsive Ed receives more than $82 million in taxpayer money annually, and it is expanding, with 20 more Texas campuses opening in 2014.

Charter schools may be run independently, but they are still public schools, and through an open records request, I was able to obtain a set of Responsive Ed’s biology “Knowledge Units,” workbooks that Responsive Ed students must complete to pass biology. These workbooks both overtly and underhandedly discredit evidence-based science and allow creationism into public-school classrooms.

A favorite creationist claim is that there is “uncertainty” in the fossil record, and Responsive Ed does not disappoint. The workbook cites the “lack of a single source for all the rock layers as an argument against evolution.”

As the video above demonstrates, the fossil interests that seek to delay responses to climate change are perfectly willing to piggyback on top of the fundamentalist movement to introduce creationism into science curriculums.

Policymic:

In the past five years since 2008, among the hottest years in U.S. history, ALEC has introduced its “Environmental Literacy Improvement Act” in 11 states, or over one-fifth of the statehouses nationwide. The bill has passed in four states, an undeniable form of “big government” this “free market” organization decries in its own literature.

ALEC’s “model bills” are written by and for corporate lobbyists alongside conservative legislators at its annual meetings. ALEC raises much of its corporate funding from the fossil fuel industry, which in turn utilizes ALEC as a key — though far from the only — vehicle to ram through its legislative agenda through in the states.

DeSmogBlog investigation last year found that the Environmental Literacy Improvement Act’s origins date back to 2000.

The Act’s creation is directly connected to the ongoing efforts of another corporate-funded group, the Heartland Institute (of “Heartland Institute Exposed” fame), a group well plugged into the climate change denial machine.

Slate:

As the map below illustrates, creationism in schools isn’t restricted to schoolhouses in remote villages where the separation of church and state is considered less sacred. If you live in any of these states, there’s a good chance your tax money is helping to convince some hapless students that evolution (the basis of all modern biological science, supported by everything we know about geology, genetics, paleontology, and other fields) is some sort of highly contested scientific hypothesis as credible as “God did it.”

creationschools

bookbig3small
Science 5, Third Edition, copyright 2011, BJU Press, Greenville, South Carolina
bookbig1small
United States History – Heritage of Freedom In Christian Perspective, Third Edition; A Beka Book, copyright 2009, Pensacola Christian College.

NYTimes:

History and economics texts are also infused with fundamentalist theology and an unabashedly conservative viewpoint. The Great Depression, one says, was exaggerated to move the country toward socialism, and it described “The Grapes of Wrath” as propaganda.

Frances Paterson, a professor at Valdosta State University in Georgia who has studied the books, said they “frequently resemble partisan, political literature more than they do the traditional textbooks used in public schools.”

Mr. Arnold, the headmaster of the Covenant Christian Academy in Cumming, Ga., confirmed that his school used those texts but said they were part of a larger curriculum.

“You have to keep in mind that the curriculum goes beyond the textbook,” Mr. Arnold said. “Not only do we teach the students that creation is the way the world was created and that God is in control and he made all things, we also teach them what the false theories of the world are, such as the Big Bang theory and Darwinism. We teach those as fallacies.”

39 thoughts on “The Weekend Wonk: Educating for Ignorance – It’s “School Choice” Week!”


  1. As someone who takes Christian inspiration very seriously it pains me find people who come to astonishing views on the basis of the Christian tradition, not only with climate change but many other hobby horse issues. However I think it is important to understand that for many of these Christian people the rock bottom of these views is not so much the ideas themselves as their loyalty to a what they perceive as most important in life.
    Ridicule will therefore achieve nothing whatsoever. In fact, love of truth also has a lot to do with loyalty. Many of these people coud be brought around to more reasonable points of view if they didn’t feel they were being disloyal to their religious foundations on which they stand. It is thus very important to keep pointing out the people and agenda behind the disinformation.
    It is also important to explain repeatedly that many in the scientific community have also been won over slowly and against their initial inclinations to accept many of the rather fearful implications of what we now know about climate change. It is a very normal reaction — whether people are religious or not — to shy away from the more alarming sides of climate science and to escape the implications and assume things will turn out allright and keep moving along as they always have.


    1. Your first two paragraphs are well put. I think you get a bit off track in your last paragraph. IMO, scientists are substantially immune to what you imply by “…many in the scientific community have also been won over slowly and against their initial inclinations to accept many of the rather fearful implications…it is a very normal reaction….to shy away from the more alarming sides of climate science and to escape the implications and assume things will turn out all right and keep moving along as they always have”.

      True scientists are guided by FACTS and rational analysis of those facts, and not by ideology and “belief”. When irrefutable facts appear suddenly, scientists react rapidly—i.e., when people start dropping dead in the streets in large numbers, they quickly look for causes and cures rather than just dropping to their knees and praying. They move as fast and as far as the facts demand, and are far better able to resist the “head in the sand” denial of any phenomenon that makes them personally uncomfortable because of any “religious overlay” or human shortcomings.

      Since nearly all of those few in the “scientific community” who need “winning over” are either paid deniers or nut-jobs like Monckton (who is not a scientist anyway), it is really a waste of rime to even mention “winning them over”.


    2. Johan. It is encouraging that among some Christians, younger Christians especially, there is acceptance of climate change and the responsibility to act on it, this under the rubric of “good stewardship” of the earth God has given us. A good role model for such is of course Katherine Hayhoe, a climate science and a devout Christian (her husband a pastor, I think).


    1. This is terrific stuff! LMAO I will devote too many hours (from my diminishing inventory) to watching it. Thank you.


      1. Glad I could waste your time with something enjoyable. She certainly entertains, maybe offends some. She is part of a group of bloggers that defended against creationist, climate denier, ultra right religion types that tried to silence thunder foot. He has a series called ” why people laugh at creationists”. In my meanderings, potholer54 came up somehow also and he has a wonderful series. Potholer has a wonderful, colorful wit. He sometimes expresses what we wish we could say to deniers and young earthers.


  2. There was I thinking that child abuse was illegal in the US ;0

    They should have an exclusion zone around every US school and prohibit creationists or climate change deniers from coming within a mile of any school.


    1. Excellent idea—-we already have Drug-Free School zones and guns are prohibited on school grounds nearly everywhere. IMO, we should have “Ignorance Exclusion Zones” as well. That would take care of the creationists, AGW deniers, right wing-nuts, etc.

      After all, ignorance and stupidity have killed more people than drugs and guns, and unchecked AGW is going to get us all—–where are our priorities?


      1. …Or maybe rename the “Darwin Awards” as “the creationist awards”.

        Also two relevant stories for the UK where we are taking a bit of a pounding from yet another set of storms:

        Firstly, a UK railway line has been sweep away by heavy seas:
        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26042990

        Secondly, the Beeb have a report out about NSA spying on last years climate talks:
        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25981242

        Sorry to wander off topic, but thought you folks stateside might like to have a read.


        1. Daryan – thanks for the post on England’s flooding. Exchanging this info is the best way we can be aware of GW extreme weather globally, by being a network of informed viewers.


          1. Take a look at the “Icy hell in Slovenia” thread for more on the UK weather.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading