Melt Season’s First Signs in Arctic

Andrew Freedman in Climate Central:

Following more than two decades of Arctic sea ice thinning and melting, an unusual event just weeks before the start of the spring melt season is providing visual proof of how vulnerable the ice pack really is.

During the end of February and continuing into early March, large fractures in the sea ice were observed off the north coast of Alaska and Canada, from near Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic to Barrow, Ala., the northernmost city in the U.S.

The rapid climate change in the Arctic and sharp decline of sea ice has been attributed to manmade global warming, along with natural climate variability, and projections show the region becoming seasonally sea ice free by midcentury.

According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colo., this fracturing event appears to be related to a storm that passed over the North Pole on Feb. 8, 2013, creating strong off-shore ice motion. The event is unusual but not unheard of, as similar patterns were seen in early 2011 and 2008. However, the NSIDC said the fracturing this time is more extensive.

The spread of the ice fractures can be seen in a video animation from satellite imagery, provided by the NSIDC.

The NSIDC said the fracturing is likely a sign of the prevalence of young and thin sea ice, which can be disturbed more easily by weather patterns and ocean currents, and also melts more easily when exposed to warm air and ocean temperatures during the melt season. As Arctic sea ice extent has plummeted since 1979, down to a record low in September 2012, first-year ice has become much more common across the Arctic, as thick, multiyear ice has declined.

“The large area of fractured ice is located in predominantly first-year ice, which is thinner and easier to fracture than thick, multiyear ice,” the NSIDC said on its website.

Arctic Sea Ice Blog:

For instance last year at the start of February I wrote about the spectacular lack of ice in the Kara and Barentsz Seas, notably around Novaya Zemlya. I had a hunch that this was pretty much unprecedented during the satellite era and said as much in a guest post for Climate Progress. I was mildly criticized for it by the NSIDC’s Walt Meier via Climate Central (and I will never forgive him for it 😉 ). Now the hunch turned out to be reasonably correct – although there had been a similar retreat of ice at a later date in 2011, caused by wind patterns – but I didn’t invest the time to make sure it was.

This year things are calm in the Kara and Barentsz Seas. At the surface that is, with not even a breeze towards the coast to show how strong or weak the ice is. But as usual, when it’s calm on one side of the Arctic, something is going on on the other side. Some commenters have been keeping a sharp eye on this, and I think it now merits a blog post of its own, if only because of the possible implications this event might have for the ice pack once the melting season gets underway. And it’s big time spectacular.

Last week, on February 22nd commenter A-Team – who has really been animating the blog lately, figuratively and literally speaking – made the animation you see on top of the post, showing massive cracking in the Beaufort Sea. In the following days fellow commenter Jim Hunt picked up on that and wrote a blog post on his Econnexus blog called Arctic Sea Ice is Cracking Under the Strain with a spectacular image of the ice pack in the Beaufort Sea on February 27th.

Meanwhile over on the Arctic Sea Ice Forum commenter BornFromTheVoid remarked that a similar thing occured last year in April. A-Team was quick to turn that event into an animation (that I had to edit a bit to cut down on size):

According to A-Team: “If taken as a simplistic predictor of the 2013 melt season, we are 51 days ahead of last season.”

The fact that the ice lets itself be pulled so willingly into the Beaufort Gyre so early in the year, with the start of the melting season still some 4 weeks off, is a sure sign that it’s thin. This, of course, is a very bad prelude to the melting season, even if there are a couple of weeks left for the ice to thicken. Those huge cracks will freeze over, but the ice will be very brittle and the first to go, probably creating open spaces between multi-year ice floes where the Sun will shine and quickly heat things up. Unless the cloud cavalry comes to the rescue. Like A-team says: “Beginning of the end, end of the beginning, or just a bad hair day for the ice pack — we’ll have to wait and see.”

UPDATE:

Arctic Sea Ice Blog:

This image was posted yesterday by Chris Reynolds from the Dosbat blog:

leads

To recapitulate: It is normal for the ice to crack and for leads to occur. However, this is very extensive cracking and there are some very big leads, and all of it seems to come earlier than expected. Given last year’s melting mayhem and the low amount of multi-year ice, it makes one wonder whether this early cracking will have any effect in the melting season to come.

There are still several weeks to go before this part of the Arctic is going to start melting, up till then the ice will actually thicken some more, even when the Sun’s rays start to reach the ice. But the ice is already getting broken up in smaller pieces, which means that 1) the pack becomes more mobile (like we saw last year), and 2) the thin ice that now grows to fill up the leads, will go first when the melting starts, potentially leading to more open water between floes to absorb solar energy and convert it to heat.

But maybe not. Maybe this will have zero influence. We don’t know. That’s why we watch.

28 thoughts on “Melt Season’s First Signs in Arctic”


  1. Hi Peter,

    Thanks for including a link to my own version of the early days of these events in your article.

    Please note that the rectangle on your map of the Arctic needs increasing in area by a factor of 4 or thereabouts. By March 12th the fractures had spread into the area of multi-year ice between Ellesmere Island and the North Pole, as evidenced by Chris Reynolds’ image above, and a similar one here:

    http://econnexus.org/projects/the-distributed-arctic-sea-ice-model/

    If you try clicking the link in that article to the US Navy’s latest ice thickness forecast you will see that even more excitement is predicted for we Arctic sea ice watchers.

    Cheers,

    Jim


    1. But it’s in The Daily Mail man!!! It has to be true.
      Interestingly the climate scientists Prof. Myles Allen quoted in the article gave this lecture (below)about a year ago,and I doubt that the climate trends have changed so radically in one year enough for him to change his mind. My guess is that he was quoted out of context:


      1. Long before I read your take on these events, I felt a sudden urge to comment on the Mail’s “story”. I tried twice, but neither of my comments have yet seen the light of day on The Mail Online. The most popular comment on the whole story was also hidden in the dark for a considerable period of time. Here’s my take on all of that:

        http://econnexus.org/the-strange-tale-of-the-mail-and-the-snow-dragon/

        Who is it that’s conning who here?


        1. I was quite surprised that the more rational comments had such huge positive votes considering who usually reads the Mail. Hope they finally post your comment.Good luck!


          1. Thanks for your good wishes. I shall need them!. They finally posted A comment of mine. It seems the “Mail Moderators” are remarkably swift to show their approval as long as you’re not being too controversial:

            http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/registration/1363517155544642/profile.html

            In case it’s of interest, here’s George Monbiot versus David Rose from the Grauniad back in 2010:

            http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/dec/08/david-rose-climate-science

Leave a Reply

Discover more from This is Not Cool

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading