Jeff Masters: How Climate Change is Pumping Weather Extremes
March 6, 2023
Above, massive snows in California mountains have created dire situations for many towns. Meanwhile, an atmospheric river is bearing down, that could create even more havoc. What’s going on?
Are odds of warm #AtmosphericRiver storm in northern CA around 3/10-11 increasing? Yes. Are there related concerns because of near-record snowpack? Also yes. However, current operational model runs are *still near very upper end of their respective ensembles*.[1/5] #CAwx#CAwaterpic.twitter.com/NzL1HJV1To
So what’s up with the weather? Because weather is naturally extreme, could the extraordinary weather events in recent years be caused mostly by natural variability, with the expansion of the internet and media hype altering our perception of the weather? Undoubtedly, increased awareness of extreme weather can play a role in the perception that the weather is getting more extreme.
But all weather is now occurring in an atmosphere fundamentally altered by global warming. Heat is energy. More heat in the atmosphere means that there is more energy to power extreme weather events. Moreover, the extra heat energy from human-caused global warming has fundamentally disrupted atmospheric circulation patterns. The combination of more heat energy and a disrupted atmospheric circulation has made extreme weather events more common and more intense, a phenomenon climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe calls “global weirding.” The resulting weather disasters are severely stressing a society constructed for the old, somewhat calmer climate of the 20thcentury.
I find it effective to express temperature changes in ice age units. Here is a plot of the 21st century: today's business-as-usual puts us on track for about 0.5 ice age units of warming in 2100.https://t.co/cgJRf41MAF
Since the preindustrial times of the mid-1800s, Earth’s climate has warmed by about 1.2 degree Celsius (2.2°F). That may seem like a trifling amount until one considers the difference in global temperature today compared to the last Ice Age, when mammoths roamed the Earth and sea levels were 300 feet lower.
The average global temperature difference between then and now is about 6 degrees Celsius (11°F), or what we can call one “ice age unit.” By that definition, people have already warmed the Earth by 20% of an Ice Age unit. Troublingly, current policies have us on track to warm the planet by about 2.7 degrees Celsius — nearly half an Ice Age unit — by the end of this century, as climate scientist Andrew Dessler explains in the Tweets above.
Consider climate change in terms of ice age units
Since the preindustrial times of the mid-1800s, Earth’s climate has warmed by about 1.2 degree Celsius (2.2°F). That may seem like a trifling amount until one considers the difference in global temperature today compared to the last Ice Age, when mammoths roamed the Earth and sea levels were 300 feet lower.
The average global temperature difference between then and now is about 6 degrees Celsius (11°F), or what we can call one “ice age unit.” By that definition, people have already warmed the Earth by 20% of an Ice Age unit. Troublingly, current policies have us on track to warm the planet by about 2.7 degrees Celsius — nearly half an Ice Age unit — by the end of this century, as climate scientist Andrew Dessler explains in the Tweets above.
Here I am showing average temperatures over land areas in each hemisphere and for land areas not including polar regions. The baseline here is 1850-1900. The graphic will be updated monthly. pic.twitter.com/Pw7gaKVJSD
Thus, 1.2°C of warming is very significant, particularly considering that over land areas — where people live — the warming has been greater, about 1.7 degree Celsius (3.1°F). And over Northern Hemisphere land areas, the warming has been even higher, about 1.9 degree Celsius (3.4°F).
More heat means more energy to power heat waves, droughts, and wildfires
When weather patterns favor a dry pattern, global warming will cause the heat waves that occur during those dry periods to be more intense. And since warmer air can hold more water vapor, soil and plants will lose more moisture to the air, causing increased drying, more frequent and more intense droughts and higher wildfire risk. A large volume of research now connects human-caused climate change to increased heat, drought, and wildfires, leading to impacts already beyond what was anticipated even 20 years ago.
Figure 1. Global economic losses from drought from 1975-2022 (in 2021 USD) have shown an increase, with more intense droughts because of climate change potentially a contributing factor. However, increased crop yield, more acreage of crops grown, an accelerating agribusiness, and increases in crop insurance coverage have also caused increased drought losses over time. (Image credit: Aon 2021 annual report, with 2022 numbers from the 2022 annual report
When weather patterns favor storms, global warming increases the heat energy available to storms. This extra heat energy can be converted to the kinetic energy of their winds, driving more wind and storm surge damage.
Moreover, heat-charged storms will also be able to dump more precipitation, since a warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapor. Each degree Celsius the atmosphere warms increases the amount of water vapor that can be present by 7%, leading to more intense heavy precipitation events. And when that extra water vapor condenses inside a storm, the “latent” heat required to evaporate the water is released, invigorating the storm, allowing it to grow larger and stronger and pull in even more moisture.
Globally, atmospheric water vapor has increased 5-20% since the 1960s, and this is a primary factor in the increase in heavy precipitation events in most regions of the world in recent decades.
The graph shows that over the last 400,000 years, ice ages corresponded with temperatures about 3 C colder than our pre-industrial standard (~1900). Perhaps my graph is incorrect? In other reading, I’ve also gotten the impression that the experts in paleoclimate consider an “ice age” to be, on average, colder than the 3 C, I was assigning based on that graph.
March 6, 2023 at 12:53 pm
This is a nit, but Dessler says: “6 degrees Celsius (11°F)… we can call one “ice age unit.” ” I’ve personally always thought of 3 C as one “ice age unit”, based on this graph: http://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/images/impacts/slr-co2-temp-400000yrs.jpg
The graph shows that over the last 400,000 years, ice ages corresponded with temperatures about 3 C colder than our pre-industrial standard (~1900). Perhaps my graph is incorrect? In other reading, I’ve also gotten the impression that the experts in paleoclimate consider an “ice age” to be, on average, colder than the 3 C, I was assigning based on that graph.