NOAA Update on Great Lakes Ice

February 24, 2023

Historically, this time of year, the land surface, and most of the water, in the satellite photo above would be uniformly white.

What happens to 20 percent of the world’s unfrozen fresh water should probably be of concern to anyone that lives on this planet and drinks water.

NOAA:

Ice coverage has reached a record low in the Great Lakes for this time of year

As of February 13, 2023, only 7 percent of these five freshwater lakes was covered in ice, which is significantly below the 35-40 percent ice cover that is expected for this time of year, according to NOAA’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory(GLERL). 

Ice extent across the basin briefly jumped up to 21 percent in early February in response to a cold snap, but has been declining since. Maximum ice cover typically occurs between mid-February and early March. 

NOAA has been keeping records on the Great Lakes ice extent since 1973.

Air temperatures are the main factor affecting ice cover on the Great Lakes, and a warmer than average January contributed to the lack of ice. According to the U.S. National Ice Center, each of the five lakes experienced warmer than average air temperatures in January. In addition, it was an especially warm January across the contiguous U.S.: The average temperature was 35.2 degrees F (5.1 degrees above average) according to NOAA, and January 2023 Earth’s seventh-warmest January on record

Although there is year-to-year variability in the ice cover of the lakes, NOAA research has found that in recent years ice cover is in a downward trend. An analysis led by Jia Wang, an ice climatologist at NOAA’s GLERL, found significant declines in average ice cover of the Great Lakes between 1973 and 2017. During the winter period of those 44 years, which runs from December 1 to April 30, average ice cover on the Great Lakes declined about 70 percent.

Ice cover protects the shoreline of lakes – without it, high waves can scour the coastline and cause severe flooding. 

Low ice coverage on the lakes can be a set up for large severe “lake effect” snow storms, says Ayumi Fujisaki-Manome, a researcher at NOAA’s Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research at the University of Michigan. “The moisture and heat from the lake surface water are absorbed into the atmosphere by storm systems, and then fall back to the ground as snow in the winter. When ice is not present, we can end up with big snow storms like those that hit Buffalo, New York in December. 

Although human-caused warming plays a role in this decline, other key factors contributing to reduced ice loss are long-term patterns of climate variability over the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Four patterns of climate variability are contributing to ice cover changes: the North Atlantic Oscillation, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. 

“Each year, we have to look at these four patterns to model ice cover,” said Wang. “Right now, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation together with the North Atlantic Oscillation are causing warming in the Great Lakes.”

GLERL will continue to monitor the ice levels, and will announce end-of-season ice extent later this year. 

Advertisement

2 Responses to “NOAA Update on Great Lakes Ice”

  1. rhymeswithgoalie Says:

    Nerd note: Another factor that can reduce ice cover is pollution, as when the Charles River Basin by Boston didn’t start freezing over again until after the Charles River Watershed association started cleaning it up (1970s). It had been subject to over a century of both industrial and sewage pollution before then. (The joke was that if you fell off a boat in the Charles River they didn’t bother to pull you out.)

    Now, however, the problem is primarily higher temps.

    • Mark Mev Says:

      Not sure when they exactly started to clean up that river. In 1981 when I lived in downtown Boston I decided to learn to sail a small boat in the Charles River near the esplanade. Any time that river water splashed on my skin I was left with a protective oily film on me. The smell wasn’t that bad, especially compared to the Niagara River in the 60s and early 70s.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: