Will A Cleaner Grid Stand Up to Weather Extremes? (spoiler: yes, actually)

December 20, 2022

We’ve come to expect regular warnings about grid reliability in the face of more renewable energy and the shut down of more traditional coal power plants. We heard it from the Wall Street Journal (written by a right wing Think tank “expert”) at the beginning of summer. (spoiler – no disasters happened)

Now we have a new warning that’s gotten a lot of play. Turns out it, too, was written by a fossil fuel industry lobbyist.

This will help clarify.

The Gazette – Cedar Rapids, IA:

Here we go again. Grid operators and utilities are issuing dire warnings about looming blackouts this winter, and often linking the threat to the closure of coal plants.

The narrative serves utilities like MidAmerican Energy well, whose parent company Berkshire Hathaway Energy is one of the dirtiest utilities in the nation. MidAmerican would love to keep its large fleet of Iowa coal plants running for decades to profit shareholders, at the expense of Iowa ratepayers and our kids’ future.

We heard the same grid warnings back in June about summer peak load, and we have the same Mark Twain inspired reaction: “Few things are more irritating than when someone who is wrong is also very effective in making his point.”

Sure, it sounds sensible that closing “baseload” coal plants and replacing them with “variable” renewables could stress our winter grid, but that logic actually mixes apples and oranges (or corn and beans, or uff-da: 4-H and FFA!), and here’s why.

Blackouts are not predicted by grid operators

Neither the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO, the Midwest grid operator) nor the National Energy Reliability Corporation (NERC), are actually predicting rolling blackouts, as some have reported. In fact, MISO (which is where NERC gets its data) states clearly “Under typical demand and generation outages, MISO is projecting sufficient firm resources to cover winter peak load forecasts”.

In other words, under normal winter conditions, we’re fine. Under challenging conditions, actually, we’re still fine. Under the worst-case scenario of highest load and highest outages the projections are dicey for one of three winter months, but even then, MISO “expects to maintain reliability through the use of measures” that include demand response, regional grid transfers, and other resources that don’t require blackouts.

Reliability is absolutely critical and we must deal proactively with challenges during the clean energy transition. But the current warnings sound suspiciously like a MidAmerican crying wolf in order to keep the Berkshire coal trains running, furnaces belching, and profits flowing.

Extreme weather creates risk for fossil fuel supply

The hypothetical situation causing the greatest worry in the MISO region is based on the assumption that over 46 Gigawatts of “firm” generation — that’s 37 percent of all the coal, gas, and nuclear — could fail under extreme winter conditions. So much for the reliability of traditional “baseload” generation.

Why? Because, according to the NERC Winter Reliability Assessment, the grid is stressed by “higher peak-demand projections, inadequate generator weatherization, fuel supply risks, and natural gas infrastructure,” all impacted by extreme weather. These are largely challenges to coal and natural gas plants, which develop major vulnerabilities in extreme winter weather.

One such vulnerability: fuel supply chains! Unlike renewables and storage, coal and gas plants have an endless appetite for mined, processed, and transported fuel, yet stockpiles and reserves are low and supply chains are shakier than ever.

Another vulnerability: fossil fuel plants increasingly fail as temperatures get colder. From frozen gas lines and coal piles to operational challenges, at least a third of coal plants and roughly 60 percent of natural gas plants in the MISO region are not rated to operate below negative nine degrees Fahrenheit.

Wind and solar plus storage are more reliable

The vast majority of wind in MISO is rated to operate below minus 20 and even close to or below minus 30. Solar efficiency generally rises as temperatures get colder. Solar and wind are variable in production, yes, but they are predictable in that variation, and MISO knows this and adjusts “capacity credits” for reliability planning accordingly.

And battery storage paired with solar and wind is — even by MISO’s own data — as or more reliable than fossil fuel plants. This combination is the future of a secure, clean, and reliable grid (and healthy, prosperous communities throughout Iowa).

This fact is driven home by the U.S. Department of Energy’s latest comprehensive report “Examining Supply-Side Options to Achieve 100 percent Clean Electricity by 2035.” The report demonstrates that for every hour of the year, “A 90 percent clean grid can be achieved at low incremental cost by relying primarily on new wind, solar, storage, advanced transmission, and other technologies already being deployed at scale today.”

Chickens and eggs

Which is why it is more than a little perplexing that NERC officials are calling for state regulators to encourage utilities to keep coal plants online, but they’re not calling for regulators and utilities to urgently build more storage to pair with renewables to build the reliable grid of the future.

Any Iowa farm kid (my own daughters included) could remind those NERC officials that chickens and eggs go hand in hand. For economic, health, and stewardship reasons coal must be in the rearview mirror. For grid stability and reliability, the road to renewables plus storage needs building not tomorrow, but today, and even yesterday.

Iowa regulators and policymakers hopefully realize this. MidAmerican Energy is currently proposing a great deal of new wind paired with a great deal of forever coal, which maximizes profits for shareholders at the expense of grid reliability and ratepayer’s health and pocketbooks.

Utilities should be directed to go back to the drawing board to design and build out an energy system that serves Iowa ratepayers and strengthens Iowa’s grid. This system should be based on the high performance and high reliability combination of solar, wind, and large-scale storage.

With proactive leadership, Iowa can build the strongest and cleanest grid in the country. We would be the envy of the nation, but more importantly, we’ll build the future our kids deserve.

Andy Johnson is a farmer, and executive director of Clean Energy Districts of Iowa. Warren McKenna is former manager of Farmers Electric Cooperative and a current solar consultant.

In fact, the most disastrous blackout in memory, Texas’ famous Valetine’s day debacle in 2021, showed the overwhelming vulnerability of unweatherized fossil fuel plants to a winter blast. If you have not seen this video, you really should.

Make no mistake, it’s important to get the grid right – the success of the energy transition depends on it. But there is no inherent barrier to building a grid that is clean, carbon free, and rock solid reliable.

Advertisement

3 Responses to “Will A Cleaner Grid Stand Up to Weather Extremes? (spoiler: yes, actually)”

  1. rhymeswithgoalie Says:

    Texas’ energy supply system is based on providing a minimally regulated free market in theory that they’ll give the customers the cheapest rates, which is true when the weather is well-behaved.

    Resiliency costs more, and there is currently no mechanism in the Texas system to invest in much more than duck tape and coat-hangers to keep the pipes and plants maintaining this quarter’s or this year’s profit margins.

    In Texas’ case, it’s less about the hardware and infrastructure than about the whole private profit motive mindset behind thousands of individual decisions.

    • jimbills Says:

      The weather forecast for Texas has definitely dipped much further than was previously being posted – Peter’s post last week had a meteorologist that must have had inside info that wasn’t public yet.

      In Texas, the politicians won’t dare upset the profits of the oil and gas business here. They carry far more water for them than the hundreds dead and millions freezing from the last major outage. Lip service is much cheaper for the corporations and much easier for the politicians. I’m not really holding my breath for that to change, but who knows – maybe with another couple of complete Ercot breakdowns, they’d be forced to actually address the problem.

      This storm system for Texas, though, is still far short of the scale as the one in 2021 – this one has a duration of only about 48 hours and little to no precipitation.

      • rhymeswithgoalie Says:

        …maybe with another couple of complete Ercot breakdowns, they’d be forced to actually address the problem.”

        You’re silly!


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: