Disinformation Rampant on Clean Energy

January 5, 2022

Above, KCRG in Cedar Rapids, IA, reporting on rampant misinformation, and disinformation, on clean energy across the state, and the nation.


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – People are using and pushing misinformation while debating solar farms in Linn County with elected officials, according to emails our KCRG-TV9 i9 Investigative Team received through an open records request.

The emails to Linn County Supervisors show some people pushing outright false claims like a solar farm decreasing enrollment at local school districts. Most emails push extremely misleading claims like solar panels reflect sunlight back up into the atmosphere affecting the ozone layer or solar farms will increase the local air temperatures.

Both claims are extremely misleading, according to California Institute of Technology professor Nathan Lewis. Lewis said in an email solar panels affect the ozone layer and local air temperatures similar to roads, roofs or parking lots.

“The claims are all making mountains out of molehills,” he wrote. “The effects being described are small to minimal at most.”

The investigative piece mentions “The Center of American Experiment”, a right wing “think tank” based in Minnesota, as a source of disinformation, and you’ll see the weasel that they interview there.

Ben Rodgers (D), who is a Linn County Supervisor, said he gets emails about solar farms nonstop. He said misinformation has made it more difficult to talk about local issues, but he said he has become used to people using misinformation since the pandemic began.

“One of the catchphrases is I’ve done my own research, or I’m doing research,” Rodgers said. “So you can find anything to justify your point of view.”

The search for information about solar farms can feel overwhelming online. When you search “What is a solar farm” on Google, it returns 421 Million results in less than a second. Each link contains different and sometimes conflicting information on solar panels, solar farms, and solar energy.

One of those links could come from The Center of the American Experiment, which is a think-tank in Minnesota. One claim our i9 Investigative Team found in multiple emails critical of the solar farm in Palo, Iowa cites a post from the group to argue solar panels produce toxic chemicals.


I’ve documented similar disinformation in the Michigan area, from a coal industry operative associated with E&E Legal, a coal-funded disinformation shop that should be well known to readers here, responsible for a long running harassment campaign against climate scientists like Michael Mann, Malcolm Hughes, and Jonathan Overpeck.

More from KCRG:

Issac Orr, who wrote the article for the interest group, said those chemical concerns shouldn’t worry Iowans. He said those are concerns for people living in other counties.

“I think those things aren’t necessarily those things you need to worry about if you are putting up a solar installation in Iowa,” Orr said. “But it’s not like those things aren’t affecting real people in other countries.”

American Experiment’s information in the post came from another group, which was cited in the article. However, Orr said it has no standard policy to fact-check information from another group.

“We don’t really have a standard policy,” he said. “Like if I read it and I think I agree with most of the points in it, then it adds into the conversation we’re having.”

The original claim came from an article on sciencing.com. The writer, who is David Nguyen, told our i9 Investigative Team in an email he is a tumor biologist. However, he couldn’t give us direct information about his qualifications to speak on solar panels, other than “some knowledge of environmental toxicology.”

Regardless, multiple people used Orr’s post to argue NextEra Energy’s solar farm would devastate the Linn County’s environment and create serious health concerns to elected officials.

Tim Weninger, who studies how humans consume and curate information at the University of Notre Dame, said people using misinformation isn’t a new problem, but it can spread easier on social media. He said interest groups with their own goals can put out information with good intentions that eventually gets turned into misinformation.

“Those kernels of doubt and misinformation someone else takes it and goes ‘I heard, I forgot where’ and they tell their neighbor [information] or they post it on Facebook, they post it on Instagram or Twitter and it takes off,” Weninger said.

He said the spread of misinformation results in a less informed public, especially about local issues.


The Center of the American Experiment (CAE) is a right-wing, Minnesota-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 1989.[1][2]

CAE members engage in policy research, draft legislation, testify before legislative committees, contribute to local and national media, and undertake lobbying efforts.[1] Its goal is to craft and propose “creative solutions that emphasize free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility and government accountability.”[1]

CAE is a member of the State Policy Network (SPN), a group of right-wing think tanks and other politically-active nonprofits.


3 Responses to “Disinformation Rampant on Clean Energy”

  1. J4Zonian Says:

    “has become used to people using misinformation since the pandemic began.”

    Please tell me they’re aware that disinformation has been used about other topics before the pandemic, notably the tobacco/cancer connection, evolution, and um, what was that other thing?

    Oh yeah: Global you know, whatever. Warning, or Farming, or something.

    “More from KCRG:”
    in paragraph 1 & 2 after the False Narrative video: “counties” or “countries?”

    “Those kernels of doubt and misinformation someone else takes it and goes …
    He said the spread of misinformation results in a less informed public, ”

    And less coherent. Someone want to tell me what that first sentence says?

    It continued:‘I heard, I forgot where’ … raising the question* of the sleeper effect, in which people remember the message (more or less) but not the source, which causes an increase in credibility for bad sources and a decrease in cred for good sources.

    Global Warping?

    *not “begging the question”, btw, which is used distressingly often in this situation but is completely different. Because of the misuse, there is now a logical fallacy without any meaningful name.

    Global Harping! That was it!

  2. redskylite Says:

    What did we do before we got our info by google. ?


    “Fossil fuel companies and firms that work closely with them are among the biggest spenders on ads designed to look like Google search results, in what campaigners say is an example of “endemic greenwashing”.”


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: