Fink Fossil Flight Foments Financial Food Fight

January 17, 2020

You may have heard that Larry Fink, Manager of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, sent a letter to clients this week underlining the need to move investments into sustainable technologies, and soon.
“In the near future”, he wrote, “and sooner than most anticipate, there will be a significant reallocation of capital.”

The announcement precipitated a near food-fight on the financial network CNBC. The interview segments with Fink are rather jaw dropping – after which the network’s resident science denier weighs in with typically infuriating cluelessness.


BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, says that it will now make climate change central to its investment considerations. And not just for environmental reasons — but because it believes that climate change is reshaping the world’s financial system.

That was the message in BlackRock Chairman and CEO Larry Fink’s annual letter to CEOs published on Tuesday. 

“The evidence on climate risk is compelling investors to reassess core assumptions about modern finance,” he wrote, explaining that climate change is the top concern that investors raise with BlackRock. “In the near future — and sooner than most anticipate — there will be a significant reallocation of capital.”

BlackRock manages approximately $7 trillion on behalf of investors. Its shift could signify a watershed moment for corporate action on climate, particularly among U.S. firms. BlackRock says it will require additional reporting from the companies it invests in, including disclosure of climate-related risks and plans for operating under the goals of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius.

Fink raised a number of financial risks presented by climate change: 

“Will cities, for example, be able to afford their infrastructure needs as climate risk reshapes the market for municipal bonds? What will happen to the 30-year mortgage — a key building block of finance — if lenders can’t estimate the impact of climate risk over such a long timeline, and if there is no viable market for flood or fire insurance in impacted areas? What happens to inflation, and in turn interest rates, if the cost of food climbs from drought and flooding? How can we model economic growth if emerging markets see their productivity decline due to extreme heat and other climate impacts?”

Fink said BlackRock will remove companies that generate more than 25% of their revenues from coal production from its actively managed portfolios. But only about a quarter of BlackRock’s assets are actively managed, according to Reuters. The majority of BlackRock’s assets are in passively managed index funds, and thus wouldn’t be subject to the policy. 

Nonetheless, BlackRock’s move can provide companies that want to move on climate a weighty business justification for doing so: If they don’t, they risk being dropped from the investment giant’s funds.

Fink also warned that BlackRock won’t hesitate to use its status as a major shareholder to pressure companies accordingly: “[W]e will be increasingly disposed to vote against management and board directors when companies are not making sufficient progress on sustainability-related disclosures and the business practices and plans underlying them.”

This isn’t the first time Fink has caused a stir with his CEO letter. Two years ago, his letter called on CEOs to focus less on short-term profits and more on long-term growth and making a positive contribution to society.

BlackRock has been under criticism from activists to put pressure on fossil fuel companies or stop investing in them. 

A group called The Sunrise Project was among the organizers of a campaign called BlackRock’s Big Problem, which pointed out that BlackRock is a huge investor in coal plants, coal reserves, and oil and gas companies. It also identified Fink as potentially sympathetic to their cause: “He’s a Democrat, a philanthropist, and sits on the board of a major conservation organization.” (In a 2010 interview with Vanity Fair, Fink called himself a “lifelong Democrat.”)

But Fink says the move is all about business. “We are fiduciaries,” he told The New York Times. “Politics isn’t part of this.” 

The Sunrise Project was among the conservation organizations cheering Fink’s letter on Tuesday — and hoping that it will spur other asset managers to do the same.

“BlackRock’s new initiatives match the size of the crisis we’re seeing in 2020 and are the direct result of an outpouring of pressure from the global climate movement,” Sunrise Project senior strategist Diana Best said in a statement. “BlackRock beginning its shift of capital out of fossil fuels, including today’s divestment of coal in its actively managed funds, is a fantastic start and instantly raises the bar for competitors such as Vanguard and State Street Global Advisors.”

4 Responses to “Fink Fossil Flight Foments Financial Food Fight”

  1. Keith McClary Says:

    I was reading this from an Alberta tarsands company:
    “Cenovus’s Carbon Disclosure: Managing climate-related risks”

    Click to access cenovus-carbon-disclosure.pdf

    At the bottom of page 5 they say:
    “… our direct oil sands GHG emissions intensity is 45 percent below industry average. Cenovus’s
    oil sands production has an emissions intensity that is less than the average barrel of oil refined in the U.S.”

    This is highly misleading because the “industry average” they are comparing to includes SCO (synthetic crude oil) which is very emissions intensive to process (in Alberta) from bitumen. Cenovus produces dilbit, which is bitumen dissolved with 30% condensate. The emissions intensive processing of the bitumen occurs at (mostly Texas?) refineries. I think they must also
    be giving their intensity per barrel of dilbit , not bitumen, so the number is much lower.

    So, while Cenovus has lower emissions in Alberta, it actually has greater business risk than the SCO exporters, since the high emissions from refining Cenovus’ bitumen occur in refineries in the importing countries, who may decide to limit or tax emissions.

    I have complained to the securities commission.

  2. rhymeswithgoalie Says:

    “I have complained to the securities commission.”

    Thank you.

  3. grindupbaker Says:

    @”Sir Charles” The trivial bit of science that you posted a link to for me with no explanation whatsoever other than “What The Fuck” contains nothing whatsoever that contradicts my correct science nor even speaks to it at all. You are an idiot and whoever gave you a thumbuppy for your piece of lazy crap is an imbecile.

  4. Gingerbaker Says:

    Hilarious Headline Hearkens Heady Heuristic Headaches 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: