The $4000 House
November 6, 2019
Implications for energy, efficiency, and adaptation in climate impacted areas.
Climate Denial Crock of the Week
with Peter Sinclair
-
-
Pages
Links
Climate Science Legal Defense Fund
-
Recent Posts
- Virtual Flight Over Ice Filled Crater – on Mars
- Energy’s Future Increasingly Renewable…Even in Texas..
- In Covid Economy, More Uncertainty for Gas
- Nitrous Oxide: No Laughing Matter in Permafrost
- Scientists Weigh in on Bogus “Environmentalist Apology”
- Pipeline Postponement Pads Pall over Petrol
- Biden’s Big Tent on Climate Change
- Climate Denial, Covid Denial, Part of the Same Syndrome
- Dems Release Climate Plan, But is it Enough?
- The Weekend Wonk: A Little Known Energy Storage Tech
- Music Break: Dylan + All Stars – My Back Pages
- Coal Rollers: Big Nations Aiding Fossil Fuels with Recovery Cash
- Ex-Ford CEO on Tesla Growth
- “This is Basic Science”: Last Sane Republican’s Primal Scream
- Music Break: Kasey Anderson – The Dangerous Ones
Archives
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
Blogroll
- A Few Things Ill Considered
- AGW Observer
- Clear Climate Code
- Climate Change Ireland
- Climate Charts
- Climate Place
- Climate Progress
- Climate Victory
- ClimateSight
- Deep Climate
- Deltoid
- Denial Depot
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Glimpse Science Network
- James Empty Blog
- Mind of Dan
- More Grumbine Science
- OilPrice.com
- Only In It for the Gold
- Open Mind
- Our Changing Climate
- Planet Experts
- Post Normal Times
- RealClimate
- Rocky Mountain Institute
- Scholars and Rogues
- Shale Gas Bulletin Ireland
- Skeptical Science
- Solar Power Now
- Terra Alert
- The Cost of Energy
- The Way Things Break
- Yale Climate Forum Playlist
November 6, 2019 at 6:34 pm
The building permit is California is more than $4000 dollars and it is about the same in almost every state so this number is only suitable for third world countries and the ones I have been in the poor cannot afford $4000 for a house.
November 7, 2019 at 11:33 am
The concept of 3D printed homes has been around for a while. Good to see it in actual practice here, although I was surprised to hear this is the very first one in America, and it hasn’t been field tested yet. This will surely become more prevalent in the future, though.
The $4K price must just be for the cost of the concrete framing only. There’s no way that includes roofing, wiring, labor, etc.
Most local ordinances in the U.S. have a set minimum square footage when building new homes in towns and cities. My area has a 1,500 square foot minimum – it’s actually against code to build anything smaller. The tiny home movement tries to get around those ordinances by building homes on trailers. As they’re not a permanent structure, they can bypass the coding.
The ordinances largely exist as a way to ensure profits for the construction industry. There are also some assumptions by city planners that Americans need ever larger and larger homes:
https://www.newser.com/story/225645/average-size-of-us-homes-decade-by-decade.html
The decade after WWII is interesting in that the U.S. built a bunch of under 1,000 square foot homes. The emphasis was on getting the majority housed rather than seeing a minority get massive homes. The monstrosities being built today are far more than anyone really needs, and it’s no wonder why housing costs are so extreme.
A smarter route would be to have ordinances on maximum square footage rather than minimum. Of course, that would go against the growth desires of the vast majority.
November 8, 2019 at 11:20 am
Related article in NYT today: