Surefire Intelligence. How Dumb do you Have to Be to Doubt Climate Science?

November 1, 2018

As climate denial becomes ever more preposterous in the face of calamitous planetary impacts, hard core deniers triple-down.

The extent to which the science denial industry has been able to tap into and reinforce human frailties is ridiculous, sobering, sad, and terrifying at the same time.

Above, Stephen Colbert’s commentary illustrates the desperate hunger for delusion among the Trumpist right. Below, links between climate denial and mail bomb denial.

E&ENews:

A number of climate skeptics are rejecting the threat of mail bombs sent to Democrats and the media, in what some observers describe as a nexus of conspiratorial thinking in the politically charged days before the midterm elections.

Some prominent conservatives, including many who reject climate science, have questioned whether the devices allegedly sent through the mail by Cesar Sayoc are “fake bombs.” Others described the attempted delivery of 12 or more bombs as a “hoax,” echoing claims by the president and other conservatives meant to discredit human-caused global warming.

“The Secret Service must treat these possible hoaxes as real in the unlikely event they are not another liberal scam,” wrote Kurt Schlichter, a conservative columnist with the website Townhall. He has also accused climate scientists of lying about rising temperatures.

“Climate change is a fraud and I’m going to increase my carbon footprint because the hell with you,” he wrote in March, directing his comments at Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech University.

Lou Dobbs, a Fox Business anchor, has spent years attacking climate science, at one point saying that he would be “debunking climate change” by inviting conservative researchers whose findings challenge mainstream findings onto his show. Last week, he suggested that the bombs were a political distraction by Democrats.

“Fake News — Fake Bombs. Who could possibly benefit by so much fakery?” he tweeted.

President Trump himself referred to the mail bombs as “Bombs” in a tweet he wrote before Sayoc’s arrest. Days earlier, he attacked climate scientists, including those who work for the federal government, who he said have “a very big political agenda.”

Trump’s tweet questioning the bombs was written exactly six years after a tweet, in advance of the 2012 presidential election, raised the possibility of President Obama using a bomb to sway the race.

“Be careful of an Obama ‘bomb’ to win election! Would be a horrible thing to do,” Trump wrote.

Trump has shifted the conservative base toward positions once considered unthinkable, such as an embrace of Russia and economic protectionism, said Jerry Taylor, president of the Niskanen Center and a former climate skeptic who now works to craft climate policy.

Jumping from a rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change to a denial of bomb threats isn’t that big a leap, Taylor said.

“If you’re a right-wing Trumpist conservative, you don’t want to believe that your people or your crowd is in the business of trying to kill people in the Democratic Party, and so you will harness your brainpower to come up with any narrative story or explanation that you can imagine to argue the contrary,” he said.

“Climate denialism was in a step proof of concept for Trumpism in general to the extent to which this braying about fake news and conspiracies with regards to elites and academics and scientists and reporters and all of that proved so successful in the climate arena,” he added. “It certainly laid the groundwork for metastasizing climate denialism and the tactics and strategies involved in that to other aspects of political life.”

Steve Milloy, a former member of the Trump administration’s EPA transition team who rejects climate science on his JunkScience blog, suggested that Booker, the Democratic senator who was targeted by a mail bomb, may have sent it to himself.

“Having a fake bomb addressed to you is the new Democrat status symbol,” Milloy wrote in one tweet. In another, he wrote, “I won’t be surprised to find some progressive psycho on the other end of these. Possibly not meant to explode — only to create #FakeNews chatter about presumed GOP responsibility.”

Frank Gaffney, who runs the Center for Security Policy, which has gained notoriety for promoting Islamophobia, has claimed that scientists have doubts about human-caused climate change. Scientists say it’s “unequivocal.”

Last week, Gaffney suggested that the bombs might have been a ruse to distract from negative press about liberal protesters confronting conservative politicians in restaurants.

“None of the leftists ostensibly targeted for pipe-bombs were actually at serious risk, since security details would be screening their mail,” Gaffney wrote on Twitter. “So let’s determine not only who is responsible for these bombs, but whether they were trying to deflect attention from the Left’s mobs.”

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Surefire Intelligence. How Dumb do you Have to Be to Doubt Climate Science?”

  1. neilrieck Says:

    Ask anyone on the street “tell me something about Christopher Columbus” and you will usually get the answer “he discovered the world was round”. But this answer ignores the fact that “scientists” knew the world was round more than 1732 years before that. Although there was much philosophical speculation by Greeks like Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle, Eratosthenes (a Greek living in Egypt) performed a scientific experiment in 240 BC to prove the world was spherical. Could the reason why people on the street do not believe in anthropogclimate change (even though 97% of peer-reviewed scientists say it is so) is that the scientific view has not been allowed to permeate the common culture? Remember that even during the first voyage of Columbus in 1492, there were many sailors that urged him to turn back.

  2. rhymeswithgoalie Says:

    A term from psychology has gained traction recently: DARVO

    It stands for Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender. Sound familiar?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: