Arctic Heat Ramping Up

July 31, 2017

How hot was it in Nuuk, Greenland yesterday?

So hot, 3 people had to be bumped from my Air Greenland flight because the plane would not have enough lift to carry them. Per Pilot.

Climate Central:

The Arctic is a bastion of cold, blustery weather. But in the latest sign of how quickly changes are happening, new research published this week shows that the Arctic has seen more frequent bouts of warm air and longer stretches of mild weather.

The new findings show that while warm snaps have occurred even as far as back as the 1890s, a massive shift is afoot in the region, which is warming twice as fast as the rest of the world.

The North Pole region has been ground zero for these changes. Since 1979, the number of warm events has doubled and the number of days with mild air has tripled. There are now 21 days of mild weather at the North Pole in an average winter compared to just seven mild winter days at the start of record keeping.

An international team of scientists used data from buoys, land and a ship mired in winter ice in 2015 — as well as historical records from a 19th century expedition — as the basis for the new study, published Tuesday in Geophysical Research Letters.

They defined a “warm” event as any time when the temperature rose above 14°F (minus-10°C). That’s chilly by winter standards for most regions of the globe, but is significantly warmer than the minus-22°F (minus-30°C) temperatures that are the norm for the Arctic in winter. They also looked at other extremes up to 32°F (0°C).

“In recent years, the frequency of these events and their duration have increased, together with the peak temperature recorded during these events,” said Robert Graham, a researcher at the Norwegian Polar Institute who led the study.

Graham and his colleagues also looked at the Pacific side of the region and found an uptick in warm winter days and events, albeit at a lower magnitude than the North Pole.

Julienne Stroeve, a sea ice expert at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, said the change is an important one to note and could help further research on changes in winter ice pack.

The North Pole sits on the Atlantic side of the Arctic, an area that has seen more storms come swirling up from the Atlantic, dragging warmer air along with them. Graham said that was one reason for the larger increase in the length and duration of mild winter days there. Warm water is also pushing deeper into the Arctic Ocean from the Atlantic, further changing the region.

Background temperatures have also been rising faster there. The North Pole region has warmed 2.3°F (1.3°C) per decade since 1979, a trend largely driven by climate change. Though the new study doesn’t tease out whether the increase in warm days is due directly to climate change, it’s part of a huge pile of evidence of how rising carbon pollution is altering the Arctic faster than the rest of the world.

“While surface temperature data from the Arctic are less reliable than elsewhere, the authors tap into a variety of different measurements that all tell the same story,” Jennifer Francis, an atmospheric scientist at Rutgers University, said. “The trends go hand-in-hand with dwindling sea ice and thawing permafrost.”

Winter sea ice has hit a record low three years in a row and the summer minimum has been declining by more than 13 percent per decade since the late 1970s. That’s a sign of how warm the Arctic is becoming, creating a feedback loop that ensures ever more warming because dark, open water absorbs more heat than white sea ice.



5 Responses to “Arctic Heat Ramping Up”

  1. redskylite Says:

    It’s certainly changing fast up around the Arctic and I attach a fairly lighthearted article from the Siberian Times that has some nice photography, including a Siberian vineyard and speculation of the lands as the world’s playground in the 2080’s. There is a bit of serious science in the article and it states there is an estimated 1, 400 gigatons of buried carbon held by permafrost globally. This agrees with a NSIDC estimate and Wikipedia except it is just for the Arctic.

    Difficult to get an accurate estimate for the Antarctic’s potential of buried carbon but there seems a chance it is a lot greater than that. Maybe the Antarctic release is projected so far in the distant future it isn’t considered too much. It will be a challenge for future generations though.

    The assumption is of course that the world is still in detente and with relative peace in that era, unspoiled by man’s appetite for more sophisticated ways of killing each other. I can’t help thinking that is yet another super optimistic hope.

    “Siberia may become ‘more hospitable’ with people flocking to enjoy its more moderate weather, say researchers from the V. N. Sukachev Institute of Forest.

    Among the benefits of climate change will be milder temperatures, less permafrost, and the hope of vastly increased crop production, enticing in more settlers, with a potential three-fold rise in the population, say scientists.

    ‘By the end of the 21st century, 50%-80% of central Siberia might have a climate suitable for agriculture, with traditional Siberian crops shifting northward by as much as 70 kilometres per decade,’ according to one study cited by the experts.”

  2. Tom Bates Says:

    The start of record keeping at the north pole seems to be 1979, i guess they simply ignore the satellite data from the 1960’s, the nimbus series though it has apparently been digitized by a researcher last year. We have records from other areas which suggest temperatures, we even have new articles like this

    We have NASA data like this as well You will note the RSS and UAH data are improperly dumped on top of the surface data to pump up the apparent temperature, The people who made the graft simply ignore the Starr data which is showing a decades long decrease in temperature.

    If you look at this last one you notice no temperature rise for 90 plus years and than a spike after about 1991 of about 0.5F. mostly due to two very warm El Nino’s which have gone away. In any case 1979 to date is such a short time period you cannot claim any predictions based on that unless you are god. I doubt the purveyors of the doom and gloom are gods, sloppy science types yes, Gods no..

Leave a Reply to redskylite Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: