Reality Check: Bringing Back Coal Not in the Cards

November 12, 2016

coalfade

Forbes:

And yet here is Trump, by his promises at least, insisting that coal mining is going to come back with all those glorious jobs. It just isn’t I’m afraid, economics is stronger than politics here. I’ve made this point before, back in May in fact:

The third reason is the killer: economics. Fracking has made natural gas cheaper than coal for power generation. Thus new generations of power plants are going to be gas ones, not coal. And refurbs and life extensions of coal plants aren’t going to happen for the same reason. There’s just not going to be anything like the same market for thermal coal in the future.

We’re not going to use as much coal in the future and the coal that we will use isn’t going to come from the Appalachian mines. Trump simply isn’t going to bring back all those mining jobs. They’re gone, gone forever. Just like those assembly line jobs in electronics. And pining for the lost blue collar jobs isn’t going to help in the slightest. The thing to do now is to work out what other task that same labor can do.

And the same point is being made today at Reuters:

Donald Trump’s election has thrown an apparent lifeline to beleaguered coal producers but he may not be able to do much to revive the fortunes of the industry.

The U.S. coal industry has been a victim of the shale revolution and the enormous quantities of cheap gas that have been unleashed by hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling.

There is not much a future Trump administration can do to protect coal producers, who have mostly been the victim of economic forces rather than politics and the Obama administration’s “war on coal”.

Kentucky.com:

In May, President-elect Donald Trump stood on the stage at the Charleston Civic Center in West Virginia, put on a miners helmet and pretended to shovel coal.

“If I win we’re going to bring those miners back,” Trump said at the rally. “…These ridiculous rules and regulations that make it impossible for you to compete … we’re going to take that all off the table, folks.”

With Trump’s election and Republicans controlling both chambers of Congress, many in Kentucky are now waiting to cash in on the Republican promise of more coal jobs.

U.S. Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, though, wasn’t making any promises Friday.

“We are going to be presenting to the new president a variety of options that could end this assault,” McConnell said at the University of Louisville. “Whether that immediately brings business back is hard to tell because it’s a private sector activity.”

The interim president of the Kentucky Coal Association was more direct about the future of coal mining in Eastern Kentucky.

“I would not expect to see a lot of growth because of the Trump presidency,” Nick Carter said in an interview. “If there is any growth in Eastern Kentucky, it will be because of an improved economy for coal.”

Experts agree that environmental regulations placed on the coal industry contributed to a rapid decline of the coal industry over the past few years, but there have been other, more important economic factors at play.

“The issues, particularly in the eastern part of Kentucky, are more than the increase of regulations,” said Ken Troske, Sturgill Professor of Economics at the University of Kentucky.

One of those issues is a decrease in demand for coal.

Carter said the low price of natural gas contributes to the lack of demand for coal. As the energy industry builds new power plants, it’s more likely to build plants that run on natural gas because the price isn’t as high.

So how will Trump and McConnell help ailing communities where high-paying coal jobs have evaporated?

McConnell’s solution isn’t a stimulus plan, although he expects to continue working with the Appalachian Regional Commission, an agency that funnels federal money to economically struggling coal communities.

“A government spending program is not likely to solve the fundamental problem of growth,” McConnell said. “…I support the effort to help these coal counties wherever we can but that isn’t going to replace whatever was there when we had a vibrant coal industry.”

Bloomberg:

Renewable energy was the biggest source of new power added to U.S. electricity grids last year as falling prices and government incentives made wind and solar increasingly viable alternatives to fossil fuels.

Developers installed 16 gigawatts of clean energy in 2015, or 68 percent of all new capacity, Bloomberg New Energy Finance said in its Sustainable Energy in America Factbook released Thursday with the Business Council for Sustainable Energy. That was the second straight year that clean power eclipsed fossil fuels.

The biggest growth came from wind farms, with 8.5 gigawatts of new turbines installed as developers sought to take advantage of a federal tax credit that was due to expire at the end of 2016; Congress extended it in December.

 Utility Dive:

During his campaign Trump also promised bring back coal jobs. That could be a tougher task. Even the Trump insider admitted that the candidate might have “oversold what he can do” concerning coal jobs. The closure of coal-fired power plants and the decline in domestically consumed coal has more to do with low natural gas prices than it does with the Environmental Protection Agency, he said.

In fact, if Trump follows through with his pledge to spur $1 trillion in private sector infrastructure spending with $140 billion in tax credits that could further erode coal’s place in the nation’s generation mix by removing regulatory hurdles to the fracking of natural gas from tight shale formations. That, in turn, could lead to more pipeline infrastructure and more natural gas-fired power plants, especially if climate change regulations, such as the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, are challenged, which appears to be likely.

Trump’s emphasis on infrastructure, while most likely focused on public works such as roads and bridges, could also extend to transmission lines, especially in the western parts of the nation where many power lines are under more direct federal control.

Even if business as usual prevails for much of the power sector — there could even be an uptick in the financing pipeline or transmission deals — there could still be some pain. There will be “enormous casualties among climate change activities,” the Trump insider said. But, he added, “Trump doesn’t want to turn his back on climate change.”

Trump likes nuclear power, and he may push the zero emission attributes of nuclear plants, but, the insider said, there is little that can be done to reverse the economic challenges that nuclear power faces which, like coal-fired generation, are largely the result of low priced natural gas, which has driven down wholesale power prices.

Advertisements

6 Responses to “Reality Check: Bringing Back Coal Not in the Cards”

  1. Sir Charles Says:

    The problem is that fracked gas is no better than coal for our climate. Here just one of the umpteen studies confirming that => New research shows natural gas no better than coal for mitigating climate change

    • greenman3610 Says:

      agreed. Not proposing it as a solution, but explaining that coal is dying a market-mediated death.

    • otter17 Says:

      Yeah, I recall the initial work on the emissions profile of fracking out of Cornell a few years ago. At an young energy professionals meeting/mixer in my city, I recall talking to a lawyer about the research and its possible implications for regulation. His response was that “our companies would certainly have their work cut out for them to create a good advertising or public relations campaign on that”. In reply, I gave him a stern look and said, “no, you folks would learn how to better seal the wells to prevent any methane leaks in the first place or pay for all leaks at the CO2 equivalent rate”.

      He had somewhere to go all of a sudden, lol. I think he was under the impression he was talking to another fossil fuel guy. It was an interesting group, though the leaders certainly favored the local fossil fuel industry professionals over energy efficiency engineers like me.

      Anyway, if migrating to fracked gas, that certainly would be just as dangerous as a CO2 equivalent of coal. The untold story of the fracking boom is that the USA has been undergoing declining production rates in basically all conventional natural gas wells. We have reached peak conventional gas, and Canada follows soon. We in America either import via LNG from overseas, which no port is seemingly all that willing to do, or we undergo some aggressive energy efficiency standards, solar hot water installations, etc. Also, fracking gas reserves have been downgraded over the years, too. What was once thought a juggernaught, is actually a collection of wells that peak out rather fast compared to traditional ones.

      We may see the economic decline of coal and fracking gas follow pretty closely with one another. They get more expensive as time goes on while the upstart ideas are getting cheaper.


  2. “Trump is emblematic of what anthropologists call “crisis cults.” A society in terminal decline often retreats into magical thinking. Reality is too much to bear. It places its faith in the fantastic and impossible promises of a demagogue or charlatan who promises the return of a lost golden age. The good jobs will come back. The nation will again be prosperous. The decrepit cities will be rebuilt. America will be great again. …..

    We face the most profound crisis in human history. Our response is to elect a man to the presidency who does not believe in climate change. Once societies unplug themselves from reality, those who speak truth become pariahs and enemies of the state. They are subject to severe state repression. Those lost in the reverie of the crisis cult applaud the elimination of these Cassandras. The appealing myths of magical thinking are pleasant opiates. But this narcotic, like all narcotics, leads to squalor and death. ”

    Chris Hedges


  3. The new Tesla Powerwall battery is a game changer.

    http://volewica.blogspot.com.au/2016/11/tesla-powerwall-cost-plunge.html

    Trump and the Troglodytes are powerless to stop this shift.

  4. Glenn Martin Says:

    I don’t suppose there’s an efficient way of generating power at the gas head so you’re transmitting electricity through cable instead of gas through pipeline and avoiding the leakage through the system? Something portable that can be quickly moved from gas head to gas head as the wells dry up? Of course it’s sounding like the gas heads are the problem.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: