Reactions to the New Landscape

November 10, 2016

Not a fan of Joe Scarborough, and he might well be asked why he did not make a point of offering as much free time to Bernie Sanders, and yes, Hillary, as he did to Donald Trump.
But he has a reasonable take above.

Michael Grynbaum in the New York Times:

“We probably did put on too many of his campaign rallies,” Jeff Zucker, CNN’s president, conceded during a talk at Harvard last month, a rare admission from a media mogul that saturated television coverage of Mr. Trump, while profitable, may have yielded unexpected repercussions.

Charles Homans in the NYTimes:

The Republican strategist Rick Wilson recently tweeted a Times graphicshowing that Trump had received an estimated $1.9 billion worth of free media coverage — nearly nine times what Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio each received and two and a half times what Clinton received — with the words: “Never forget. There was no movement. The media handed him this on a plate.”

Wilson’s not wrong. A Shorenstein Center survey of eight major print and broadcast outlets (including The Times) found that between June and December 2015, Trump received more than a third of all the coverage devoted to Republican presidential candidates — more than Bush and Rubio combined. If this reflects Trump’s status as, in the Shorenstein report’s words, “arguably the first bona fide media-created presidential nominee,” it also reflects a self-interest that media executives have at times not even bothered to conceal. “The money’s rolling in, and this is fun,” Les Moonves, chairman of CBS, said in February. “It’s a terrible thing to say. But bring it on, Donald. Keep going.” Perhaps no single person enabled, and benefited from, Trump’s political ascent more than the president of CNN, Jeff Zucker, who as head of NBC Entertainment greenlit “The Apprentice” and in his current role is reportedly anticipating $100 million in extra profits thanks to CNN’s wall-to-wall Trump coverage.

But then how do you explain Bernie Sanders? The Vermont senator won 22 states in the Democratic primary with less media coverage than either Bush or Rubio and more negative coverage than Trump. This year, the failings of the country’s elites, political and otherwise, unleashed in both parties forces that were beyond those elites’ control — but in only one party did they take the form of a political revolt that sanctions white nationalism, embraces conspiracism and openly considers armed resistance and extrajudicial imprisonment of its enemies.


John Abraham in the Guardian:

The election also affects how we should talk about climate change. In the US, and in many other countries, opposing steps to cut carbon pollution has become a litmus test for conservative politicians. So, in this sense, conservatives now own climate change. I can just imagine the slogans, “Climate change, brought to you by your neighborhood conservatives.”

George W Bush was the worst president ever on climate change. Back then, with the reality of climate change not as widely known, it is conceivable to give voters a pass. But not now. Anyone who voted for Trump shares the responsibility for what is now inevitable.

It’s really too bad because many conservatives certainly don’t want to destroy the Earth’s climate. Furthermore, there are some conservatives who do take climate change seriously. However, when a central belief to conservatism results in decades of inaction, it makes it impossible to avoid staring facts in the face.

Conservatives own climate change.

Conservatives own the consequences of climate change.

They own the increased droughts, more severe storms, sea level rise, and floods.

They own the heat waves, the loss of habitat and the shifting climate zones.

They own the climate refugees, the resulting political strive, and climate conflicts.

They own it all.

WBRC Tuscaloosa:

A display hanging above a coffee shop in Tuscaloosa caught several people off guard, with many calling it racially insensitive.

A woman who wants to remain anonymous sent a tip about what appeared to be a figure hanging by a rope above the O’Henry’s Coffee shop in Tuscaloosa. She isn’t the only person who expressed concern.

“It looks like a man hanging, a black African-American man hanging,” Tuscaloosa residen tJames Crawford said.

He’s referencing a picture that was taken by a woman who saw something hanging from a balcony of a building on University Boulevard and Lurleen Wallace Boulevard. The coffee shop is directly below the balcony.

Isaac Chotiner in Slate:

Trump’s embrace of babbling nonsense on the subject of climate change, for example, is a direct outgrowth of the party’s long-standing disdain for intellectualism and for science. It is horrifically new for a modern major party nominee to express racism so openly, but virtually the entire GOP has been engaged in a dedicated effort to keep black people from voting for decades now. And when you spend years telling your voters that the media peddles nothing but lies and that the president is illegitimate, you are eventually going to be saddled with someone who simply raises the stakes: The media isn’t just dishonest; it’s part of a worldwide conspiracy. The president isn’t just illegitimate; he’s a Kenyan usurper.

The GOP’s pre-Trump Trumpism allowed a dangerous demagogue to take command of the party, and now the country. Republicans may not have willed Trump, but they established the conditions for a man like him, in all his grotesque incompetence and know-nothingness, to be born. And Trump didn’t merely overwhelm the party; he was first appeased, then welcomed by opportunists and the weak-willed. He was ultimately supported by the vast majority of Republican politicians.


The Klu Klux Klan white supremacist group is openly canvassing for new members in Birmingham, Alabama, where flyers were scattered in driveways on the morning after the election, the local NBC affiliate reported. “Get off the fence, whitey, and join the only group that has ever stood for the white man,” they read. “Black radicals have reverted back to savages and more Muslims arrive daily.”

The local leader of the group confirmed they were real to and added, “We must hold Trump’s promises close, and continue on to make damn sure he follows through.”

People are also sharing individual instances of harassment from people they thought were friends and allies. One Afghan immigrant from Nashville, Tennessee, said her former neighbor, and mother’s best friend for 10 years, sent her a message telling her to “go back to where she came from.”


This is happening. Donald Trump is going to be president of the United States.

And there’s no way around it: What he’s planning to do looks like an absolute disaster for the planet (and the people on it). Specifically, all the fragile but important progress the world has made on global warming over the past eight years is now in danger of being blown up.

Trump has been crystal clear about his environmental plans. Much of the media never wanted to bring it up, never wanted to ask about it in debates, never wanted to turn their addled attention away from Hillary Clinton’s email servers to discuss what a Trump presidency might mean for climate change. But the warning signs were there:

  • Trump called global warming a Chinese hoax. He couldn’t have been blunter about this. He also tapped Myron Ebell, an avowed climate denier, to head his EPA transition team.
  • Trump has said, straight up, he wants to scrap all the major regulations that President Obama painstakingly put in place to reduce US carbon dioxide emissions, including the Clean Power Plan. With Republicans now controlling Congress, this is perfectly doable. Just pass a bill preventing the EPA from regulating CO2. Done.
  • Trump has even hinted he wants to get rid of the EPA entirely. “What they do is a disgrace,” he has said. Again, if Congress follows, he’d have the power to get rid of other regulations on mercury pollution, on ozone, on coal ash, and more.
  • Trump has said he wants to repeal all federal spending on clean energy, including R&D for wind, solar, nuclear power, and electric vehicles.
  • Trump has said he wants to pull the United States out of the Paris climate deal. There’s nothing stopping him there, either. (Technically, the US can’t officially withdraw for four years, but for all practical purposes, the Trump administration could ignore it.)

Okay, now for the deep breath.

Even under Trump, there will still be reason for hope. Political change unfolds in unexpected ways, and not everything on Earth revolves around the machinations of the US federal government. So here are a few reasons to think the fight against climate change is not yet lost:

  • States like California and New York are still pursuing their own ambitious climate policies, and it’s possible those efforts could be so successful that other states decide to follow suit.
  • Likewise, wind power, solar power, and electric cars will keep getting cheaper — it’s possible they’ll acquire a self-sustaining momentum, even without support from the US government. Or maybe some other new low-carbon technologies will emerge to shake up climate politics. (Small modular reactors, anyone?)
  • Climate activists will continue to push for action at local levels — much as they did during the George W. Bush years, when the Sierra Club began blocking a major planned expansion of coal power. It’s possible that opposition to Trump will galvanize a new generation of climate activists who find creative ways to address global warming.
  • Other countries still have their own reasons for tackling climate change, even China and India (which, note, is choking on deadly levels of air pollution in Delhi right now). It’s possible that Trump’s recalcitrance on climate change could motivate the rest of the world to redouble their efforts at curtailing emissions without us.
  • Heck, it’s even possible that Trump and the GOP could have a change of heart and decide that global warming is a real issue that needs to be taken seriously. It’s possible that Republicans could balk at repealing all these pollution regulations, realizing that they’re actually quite popular. Stranger things have happened.

So lots of stuff is possible. Climate change will continue to be a defining issue for generations, long after Donald Trump is gone — and there’s never reason to give up. But the landscape has undeniably shifted. The prospect of staying below 2°C looks increasingly bleak. Right now Trump has given every indication that he wants to gamble with the future of the only planet around that’s known to support life. And it’s a wildly irresponsible bet.

Slate again:

Arguably the strangest aspect of this election was how it made you feel as if everything was changing under your feet—and that nothing was changing at all. That was certainly true of the press: Every time you thought the press had turned a corner, it soon reverted to form. The GOP has become an extremist party without much of the media identifying it as such, and now it’s installed a volatile novice with disdain for our democracy in the White House. If we in the media return to pretending that we are not in the midst of a domestic and international crisis, we will be complicit in it.

Alex Steffens:



4 Responses to “Reactions to the New Landscape”

  1. otter17 Says:

    That Facebook post concerning the Afghan family is probably the saddest story of all Facebook posts.

  2. dumboldguy Says:

    Copied in its entirety from Daily KOS—-some good thoughts about why the Hump presidency might not be such a disaster (if we even survive the first year, that is).

    “After mourning Trump’s victory, I took the opportunity to think things through and I suddenly saw a big silver lining for Democrats. Politics is like a game of chess. Trump’s victory last night may have put the Democrats in a stronger position going forward than if Hillary had won. Here’s why I’m saying this:

    If Hillary had become president on the heels of Obama’s two terms, the Democrats would be in a very vulnerable position in the next two major elections: the 2018 midterms and the 2020 general election. Democrats would likely suffer heavy losses in the 2018 midterms due to historical precedent (the party that wins the White House usually does poorly in the following midterm elections) and sheer voter fatigue. However, with Donald Trump in the White House the tables are turned and Republicans are the ones who will be in a defensive position in 2018 as they now control both the White House and Congress and will have to give full account of their agenda and results to voters. In this scenario, Democrats are likely to make significant gains in the 2018 midterm elections.

    Then building on that, Republicans will again be on the defensive in the 2020 general election with Trump in the White House. The core of Republican policy is set up to hurt the working and middle classes and benefit the rich and powerful. Ironically, these are the same working class people who voted for Trump. They will inevitably feel disappointed over the next four years as they realize that Trump can’t magically solve their problems.

    Going into 2020 Republicans will face die-hard opposition from Democrats, a likely disillusioned white working class GOP base (the manufacturing jobs are never coming back) and an even more diverse electorate than today. All these factors will put them in a very weak position in that election. If Hillary had won this year, Democrats would be the ones on the defensive.

    2020 is just the year that Democrats need to win. The next US census takes place that year and that is also when the next congressional districts will be redrawn. Democrats can use their electoral gains in 2020 to Gerrymander Republicans out of the House of Representatives and regain full control of Congress, and lock in their majority for a decade or more.

    Also a Democratic President elected in 2020 is more likely to serve two terms, than if Hillary had won this year (one of my biggest concerns with Hillary winning this year is that she would not be re-elected in 2020 due to voter fatigue; it’s unlikely Americans would allow one party to control the White House for 4 terms).

    With a Democratic President elected in 2020 serving two potential terms (and a Democratic Congress behind him/her), Democrats would have wide sway to reshape the Supreme Court, and neutralize most of the destruction that would come with Trump’s one term in office. All this would be less likely if Democrats had retained the White House in this election.

    Sometimes the biggest disappointments in life can turn out to be the biggest opportunity.”

    • skeptictmac57 Says:

      Sounds like wishful thinking to me. I do not see the Trump voter becoming disenchanted that easily, even if he can’t do any of the things that he (magically) claimed he would do.
      Motivated thinking and a rogue media that feeds them the ‘truths’ that they want to hear will continue spinning fantasy scenarios that always will place the blame on anyone else, and trumpet (pun intended) successes no matter how unplausible and contrary to actual evidence they are.
      James Fallows with The Atlantic has been flying across the country to visit Trump land, and he made the observation that some of the small communities that favored Trump worried about the falling apart of society, failures of immigrants to integrate and loss of jobs due to outsourcing etc. All valid concerns but apparently not in THEIR community, because theirs according to them was doing fine.
      It was all the OTHER communities that they had heard about non-stop via FOX news or Limbaugh or whatever that was going to shit.
      So, if that is true, all the Trump voter has to do is just DECIDE that things are now better, regardless of whether it has improved or not, since for many of them, they were actually doing ok in the first place.
      Just think about all of the people who during Obama’s terms kept yearning for the good old Bush days (wasn’t he and his family such a class act compared to that black family) , despite the actual total failures that it brought the U.S.
      Perception is 9 10ths of reality.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: