Oil’s Tough New Landscape

August 29, 2016

oilwell2

EcoWatch:

“This was retail politics and oil lost,” was how Adrienne Alvord of Union of Concerned Scientists summed up the stunning environmental victory Tuesday in the California legislature, a victory which cemented the state’s commitment to a 40 percent reduction in climate pollution by 2030.

Only a few weeks ago there was a strong consensus that the oil industry, by spending millions of dollars on behalf of a cadre of moderate Democrats in the Assembly, had blocked just such a doubling down on the state’s existing 2020 goals. For the oil industry, victory was an existential necessity. Only by holding future climate commitments hostage could the industry hope to get Gov. Brown to abandon the state’s existing mandate that by 2020 the carbon content of fuels be cut by 10 percent. As a practical matter, the requirement means roughly 20 percent of California’s more vehicles will be driving on something other than oil—electricity, natural gas or biofuels.

And oil knows it cannot withstand a competitive transportation fuels market. Once California creates such a market and builds businesses that can produce low carbon fuels at scale, fuels competition will go global and oil’s empire will wither. But it looked like oil had survived to fight another day. Gov. Brown had signaled his next move by forming a ballot committee for a (high-risk) initiative for the fall of 2018. But a small group of climate and environmental justice advocates refused to let the Assembly moderates off the hook. Demanding a vote, they re-energized their broad coalition of main-line businesses, EJ advocates, labor, climate greens, the faith community, clean tech and clean fuels businesses, local government and public health advocates.

Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon told them he would give them a vote once they had the votes—and on Tuesday he pulled the trigger, giving the oil industry, which thought it had won, only 24 hours to regroup. It wasn’t enough and the Assembly passed SB32 by 47 votes, a six vote margin over the 41 needed. The California Nurses Association was heard from, but so was Ebay. Gov. Brown and the White House weighed in, but a lone Republican, Assemblywoman Catherine Baker joined them in supporting progress. Wednesday the Senate concurred and the bill, linked to an environmental justice focused companion bill, went to the governor for his signature.

Why the victory? Quite simply, retail politics. Clean energy now provides far more stimulus and creates far more jobs than fossil fuels. Clean power is seen by the public as the linch-pin of the state’s economic future. Jobs on the ground trump oil industry ads on the screen. It’s not accidental that states providing climate leadership are the states with the biggest clean energy sectors—California, Washington, Nevada, Oregon—and Iowa, with its nation leading wind sector and a public utility, Mid-America, that is planning to shortly hit 85 percent renewables and go on to 100 percent.

RawStory:

This has been the planet’s hottest summer in recorded history, so it’s nice to know Elon Musk has commenced his grand scheme to transform the energy business so profoundly that there’s a chance Iceland won’t become the new Jamaica after all.

One small step in Musk’s plan involves merging Tesla, his electric car company, with SolarCity, his cousin’s solar panel maker. That deal—announced in August—has been getting all sorts of blowback from short-term-thinking Wall Street nincompoops, who groan that both companies are losing money and the merger won’t help. Such doubts about Musk are like asking the Wright brothers in 1899 why they were fiddling with bicycle parts.

Future of Energy

There’s so much more at stake than just a company or stock price. The future of energy is coming into view, driven by Musk and a growing number of investors and entrepreneurs. In a decade or two, most homes and buildings will have cheap and superefficient solar panels on their roofs and high-powered batteries in their basements or garages. The batteries will store power generated when the sun shines for use when it doesn’t. Each of these buildings will be connected to a two-way power line that can allow anyone to sell excess energy or buy needed energy in an eBay-style marketplace.

Most cars will be electric, and fewer people will need to own one, since an electric, connected, self-driving car will be able to work for Uber when the owner isn’t using it, which is 90 percent of the time. That way, on-demand transportation is available just about everywhere. Your home solar panels and batteries will charge your electric car, so your home will supply most of the clean power you and your family need. You might not have to buy any electricity from some far-off coal-burning electric plant or ever again fill up at a gas station.

Electric utilities will become a shrinking provider of last resort, like the U.S. Postal Service or telephone company landlines. Some people will drive gas-powered cars, but doing so will become about as unwelcome as riding a turd-dropping horse down New York City’s Fifth Avenue. Gas cars will also get less convenient as gas stations one by one go out of business or convert to charging stations for electric cars.

Oil will still be needed for things like plastics and jet fuel, although advances in virtual reality might make business travel almost unnecessary, severely cutting demand for airlines. As demand for oil drops and prices plunge further, drilling new wells will become bad business. Before long, the amount of carbon we’re chugging into the air should drop dramatically.

Seem far-fetched? All the relevant trends point to such an outcome, probably sooner than you think.

The technology of rooftop solar is on a trajectory similar to Moore’s Law, which described how computers would get twice as powerful for the same price every 18 months for decades. The cost of solar has dropped 95 percent since the 1980s, while efficiency has rocketed. With today’s technology, solar panels covering just 0.6 percent of U.S. land mass could supply all the electricity needed for the entire country.

Meanwhile, when Tesla unveiled its first sports car eight years ago, a mass-market, all-electric car seemed more unattainable than a comfortable stiletto heel. But when Tesla took preorders for its Model 3 sedan in March, it signed up half a million buyers within weeks. Now General Motors CEO Mary Barra, followed by just about every other major carmaker, is also betting on an electric fleet.

Viable home batteries will be supremely important to make all of this take off. Musk is about to open Tesla’s $5 billion Gigafactory in Nevada, and for the first time giant batteries for cars and homes will be manufactured on a huge scale. Tesla has said that should drive down the cost of battery power by at least 70 percent.

And this is where Musk and his “Master Plan, Part Deux” kicks in. He wrote about it in July, noting that the end goal of Tesla was never to produce hot electric cars (even though Tesla just unveiled the fastest-accelerating car on Earth). Tesla built hot electric cars as an entry point for ending dependence on oil. “The point of all this was, and remains, accelerating the advent of sustainable energy, so that we can imagine far into the future, and life is still good,” Musk said.

Tesla cars will be a part of a sustainable electric system: the solar panels, the batteries, the software to manage power and trade it over networks. “One ordering experience, one installation, one service contract, one phone app,” Musk predicted.

One other factor will be turning one-way power grids into two-way exchanges. Startups such as Gridco Systems and Varentec are building that technology. As more people install solar and demand for traditional power-plant-generated electricity shrinks, it’s a good bet utilities will adopt these “intelligent power grids,” much the way cable TV companies overbuilt one-way broadcast lines with two-way broadband systems as the internet exploded in the 1990s.

Musk Leads the Way

Such a complete system is why Musk thinks the SolarCity deal makes sense, even if others rail against it. Founded in 2006, SolarCity is the biggest solar panel company in the U.S. It was growing like crazy for years, and by 2015 it was adding 12,000 customers a month and was worth $6 billion. Now SolarCity is in a hole, losing maybe $200 million last quarter, according to Bloomberg. But that deficit has little to do with solar technology and everything to do with policy decisions among regulators. For instance, earlier this year, regulators in Nevada protected the state’s utility companies by instituting rules that made solar a bad deal for homeowners. The market dried up, SolarCity pulled out of the state and laid off 550 employees, and its earnings suffered.

Musk learned something important from Tesla: He doesn’t have to change everything himself—he just needs to show the way. He didn’t need to “disrupt” the automakers. He only needed to co-opt them, get them to see electric cars as an industry-rejuvenating product and make them want to whip Tesla’s ass before Tesla blew past them. The result: The whole auto industry is reinventing itself.

 

Advertisements

6 Responses to “Oil’s Tough New Landscape”

  1. jajoslinjajoslin Says:

    “Oil will still be needed for things like plastics and jet fuel…”

    Oil will definitely still be needed for #2 diesel fuel to keep trucks running.
    Jet fuel will be made by bootleggers working for criminal syndicates & , or military formations.

    • lesliegraham1 Says:

      “Oil will definitely still be needed for #2 diesel fuel to keep trucks running”

      Don’t bet on it.

      “Nikola has engineered the holy grail of the trucking industry. We are not aware of any zero-emission truck in the world that can haul 80,000 pounds (36.3 tonnes) more than 1000 miles (1600km) and do it without stopping.”

      http://www.caradvice.com.au/468187/nikola-ceo-takes-aim-at-tesla-mercedes-benz-electric-truck-claims-zero-emissions-1000-mile-range/


      • Time for a reality check on this all-electric illusion. People fail to walk the entire trail of energy sources and sequences. There’s little chance of an all-electric economy unless nuclear fusion actually works on Earth, with reactors of varying sizes installed in cities, factories, trucks, trains and ships.

        http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a8914/why-dont-we-have-fusion-power-15480435/

        The Nikola One truck was originally going to get its range though a natural gas turbine extender (serial hybrid drive) not pure battery power, which physics wouldn’t allow for long distances. Same deal as Elon Musk’s truck concept. But Nikola Motor changed their minds to focus on hydrogen, which is merely an energy carrier that gives the illusion of being green while other forms of (reliable, dense) energy are needed to crack water for hydrogen. It’s like the ethanol ruse.

        https://electrek.co/2016/08/30/nikola-motor-one-hydrogen/

        http://www.resilience.org/stories/2006-01-03/myth-hydrogen-economy

        Elon Musk says hydrogen vehicles are “incredibly dumb” and the other Tesla name-grabber (Nikola) could be vaporware. Many people are incredibly naive about the continued necessity of fossil fuels for gross energy requirements, plus the portability advantage of liquid fuels.

        Remember that solar power comes from the sun’s fusion, and wind & hydroelectric are just secondary forms of solar energy. Solar heat/pressure differentials create wind, and solar water-evaporation creates rivers. Wind power is very space-inefficient vs. hydro, since water is 784 times as dense as air. Solar panels also aren’t very efficient but at least they can be put on current buildings without spoiling scenery. See: http://cutt.us/blightfornaught

        We really need to scale down the bulk of human society instead of trying to maintain it with technologies that destroy other parts of nature and hijack the quality of life. That’s considered pessimistic or unreasonable among the Bright Green crowd, I know.


  2. […] Future of Energy and Elon Musk’s long term plan to kill Big Oil. Hat tip to Peter Sinclair at Climate Denial Crock of the Week where I first found the mention of the article, and at Rawstory, which reprinted Maney’s […]


  3. Great article. Thank you greenman3610.

  4. Les W Kuzyk Says:

    Great optimistic predictions of our near future. Absolutely necessary, though quite late in the climate crisis game. We have chosen and will live with a noticeably damaged planet.

    Our Near Future
    https://0urnearfuture.wordpress.com/books-and-short-stories-2/


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: