Trump Can’t Bring Back Coal

May 11, 2016

There’s a moment, after a resuscitation attempt has been ongoing for a while, after you’ve basically emptied the crash cart into a carcass being held in stasis with chest compressions – when the supervising Doc looks up and says, “I don’t think we’re making a difference here – anyone have any objections?”

That’s kind of where the US coal industry is right now.
Which doesn’t stop political candidates from trying to make hay on the pain in coal country.

Anna Merlan at Jezebel:

Malignant corn chip Donald Trump campaigned in West Virginia over the weekend, where he regaled an audience of coal miners with a series of impassioned thoughts about hairspray and how it can’t possibly affect the ozone layer. This is basically just performance art at this point.

At a rally in Charleston, Trump exulted in being the presumptive GOP nominee for like, a solid minute and a half. Then, as the Associated Press video above shows, he popped on a safety helmet, pantomimed a shoveling motion, removed it just as quickly, and then, well:

That is great. My hair looks OK. I got a little spray. Give me a little spray. You know you’re not allowed to use hairspray anymore because it affects the ozone. You know that, right? I said, ‘You mean to tell me’ — because you know, hairspray’s not like it used to be. It used to be real good. When I put on that helmet — and by the way, look [pats own hair] it really is mine. Lookit. My hair. Give me a mirror. Today ya put the hairspray on and it’s good for twelve minutes, right? They say you can’t — I said, ‘Wait a minute, so if I take hairspray and I spray it in my apartment which is all sealed, you’re telling me that affects the ozone layer?’ Yes? I say no way folks. No way.

Scientific American:

Donald Trump’s promise to open shuttered coal mines in Appalachia might be as hard to fulfill as getting Mexico to pay for a new wall, analysts suggested.

The vow by the presumptive Republican presidential nominee would likely mean turning back regulations on greenhouse gases and perhaps toxic air pollutants, experts said. Even then, it’s unlikely that the cost of extracting coal from eastern mines would be cheaper than using natural gas in power plants, they said, making a widespread mining revival improbable.

“It’s very, very, very unlikely he could do something to get coal back to where it was seven years ago,” said John Deskins, director of the Bureau of Business and Economic Research at West Virginia University.


On Thursday, Trump drew wild applause in Charleston, W.Va., by telling miners in hard hats and reflective stripes to get ready to be “working your asses off” in reopened mines if he’s elected. Some people waved signs saying, “Trump digs coal,” and the business tycoon joked about needing a spritz of hair spray after trying on a miner’s helmet, the gift of an industry group.

“I’m thinking about the miners all over this country,” Trump said. “We’re gonna put the miners back to work. We’re gonna put the miners back to work. We’re gonna get those mines open.”

His comments were directed at a plunging industry. Eastern coal is facing rising extraction costs because its veins are thinner and buried deeper than the coal in Wyoming’s sprawling Powder River Basin. Eastern coal can cost up to twice as much as the western resource, making it unable to compete against cheaper natural gas, experts said.

West Virginia is especially suffering. Its production peaked in 2008 at 158 million short tons. It’s been tumbling ever since as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have supplied greater amounts of natural gas. This year, the state is expected to extract between 80 million and 90 million short tons, Deskins said.

“Coal keeps producing worse than we expect,” he said.

Chiza Vitta, an analyst with the credit rating service Standard & Poor’s, sees two ways that Trump might try to fulfill his promise to reopen the mines. The first is a protracted effort to turn back a number of environmental regulations, like the pending Clean Power Plan curbing greenhouse gases from power plants.

Other regulations might also have to be targeted to achieve a widespread revival, including rules governing toxic air pollutants. Some Republican energy advisers see that as a politically tenuous exercise.

The second scenario is more severe and even less likely, Vitta said. Trump could ask Congress to provide subsidies to the coal industry to make it more competitive with natural gas.

“That seems to me a very, very low probability,” Vitta said.

Both analysts interviewed see a continuing decline in the coal sector, with no real chance for a major recovery.

“We by no means are saying it’s going away completely,” Vitta said. “There’s always going to be a space for thermal coal. But the industry is going to be notably smaller to be profitable again.”

He added, “We do not view regulations as the primary factor for the decline.”


6 Responses to “Trump Can’t Bring Back Coal”

  1. fredeliot Says:

    Maybe hairspray killed his brain cells.

  2. ubrew12 Says:

    Clinton: “We’re going to put a lot of… coal miners out of business.” By ‘we’, she meant ‘WE’, not ‘I’. WE are going to transition to nonfossil power and in the process put coal miners out of business. It’s NOT like we have a choice. If we give a rats pattooty for OUR OWN CHILDREN, we’re going to lose them their jobs. But Clinton was actually introducing her pledge to put tens of BILLIONS of dollars toward helping these miners and their families get past that displacement. To date, has ANY CANDIDATE, promised more? (including Trump and Sanders). NO, they have not.

    But Trump doesn’t need billions to help retrain coal miners and their families. You see, after he’s done parting the Red Sea and feeding the multitude with a few loaves and fishes, he’s going to turn Carbon Dioxide into a non-greenhouse gas and turn coal into diamond. And Mexico is going to pay for a ‘friendship wall’ because they Love us so much.

  3. It’s really odd to observe that he is using these people in a vulnerable position by lying to them about the energy future in order to get their votes. Is he going to subsidize their salaries and build a huge mountain of coal that nobody wants? His hairspray comments generally say something about how deep his train of thoughts are – its monkey see, monkey do all the way.

  4. Jim Housman Says:

    I wonder what will happen to the coal industry when fracked natural gas starts to decline. Gas probably will not have to go up very much to make coal competitive. then we will see how environmental the executive branch really is.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: