Will 2016 See Record Low Arctic Ice?

April 21, 2016

Carbon Brief:

The passing of the winter peak signals the start of the melt season, where sea ice diminishes as temperatures rise through spring and into summer. Sea ice hits its lowest extent sometime in September or October. The record low for the summer minimum currently stands at 3.41m square kilometres, from 2012.

Speaking to Carbon Brief at EGU, Dr Marcel Nicolaus, a sea ice physicist at the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, says the 2016 summer could equal, or surpass, this record.

Sea ice conditions over the recent months are similar to those seen before the 2012 record, Nicolaus says. He identifies three main reasons why this year’s summer minimum could rival 2012:

“We did see a stronger melt last summer than usual, so we went into the winter in November with thinner ice than the previous years. We saw, due to the warming, less freezing and less build-up of ice mass [during winter]. And we do see a shift of secure ice towards the northern end of the Fram Strait of the Atlantic Ocean, where it’s very likely to be exported [away from the Arctic and into the North Atlantic] over the course of spring and summer.”

These reasons won’t guarantee a new record, Nicolaus adds, because sea ice melt also depends on the warmth and storminess of spring and summer – but they do boost the odds.


Warmer than normal

With almost 13,000 scientists at the EGU conference this week, Carbon Brief caught up with a few of them to ask about the prospects for Arctic sea ice for this year and beyond.

Prof Julienne Stroeve, professor of polar observation and modelling at University College London and senior research scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC), points out that a small winter sea ice extent doesn’t necessarily translate into a summer low.

She tells Carbon Brief:

“Just because we have thinner ice and less sea ice right now – starting out the melt season – that doesn’t necessarily mean we’re going to have a new record low.”

That’s because the extent to how much sea ice melts through the summer is also dependent on the weather, Stroeve says. Thinner ice is more susceptible to being broken up by storms, which means it can melt more quickly. But scientists can’t predict the weather several months in advance, so there’s still a lot of uncertainties about how sea ice will fare over the summer.

Video below shows how a late summer storm in 2012 helped break up thin ice and set the stage for a low record.

That said, Stroeve also thinks the conditions are ripe for a new record:

“We had a warm winter and the warmth has continued into spring. If you look at air temperatures for the first three weeks of April, for example, the temperatures are 4-5C warmer than normal over the whole Arctic Ocean…How that continues is going to play a key role, but certainly having thinner ice to start out with is not a good thing.”

Dr Ed Hawkins, associate professor at the University of Reading and lead investigator on an Arctic predictability project, makes a similar point. He tells Carbon Brief:

“This winter, we’ve seen very warm conditions in the Arctic. The air temperature has been very warm, which means the ice has not grown as much as it does normally, which means we’re left now at the start of the summer [melt] season with much less less ice than we do normally.
“Whether this means we get a record low year later on in September when the ice reaches its minimum depends quite a lot on what the atmosphere does of the next few months – how many storms we get across the Arctic as they will help break up the ice. So, it depends on how many of those we get as to whether this year will be a record or not.”

10 Responses to “Will 2016 See Record Low Arctic Ice?”

  1. Snow White Says:

    Note also the effects of the recent “Great Arctic Anticyclone” of 2016 on the Beaufort Sea, which now looks vulnerable to an early melt:

    The Beaufort Gyre Goes Into Overdrive

    Note the entrance to the main route through the Northwest Passage via McClure Strait opening up, together with renewed movement away from the eastern Beaufort Sea coast just as the flow of (comparatively!) warm water from the Mackenzie River starts to increase.

  2. Is there another site that has Arctic ice area / volume data similar to the NSIDC graphs? I wonder what the funding and prospects are for the satellite they were using to be repaired / replaced are?

      • redskylite Says:

        ECT – Many thanks for that link, I have always followed NSIDC and did not realize that there were alternative data sites. It is a good job Japan share their scientific data too and that we have moved on from the late 1950’s, when only the U.S were active in space technologies and shared some of their observations.

        It is amazing the number of deniers who accuse U.S official scientific organizations of falsifying data, but never admit other outside U.S bodies exist that can verify. Frighteningly some of those deniers are in very high positions too.

        Thanks again…….

  3. Snow White Says:


    We gather a wide range of Arctic ice area / extent / thickness / volume data together at:


    There you will find NSIDC / JAXA and many others. Regarding the DMSP F-17 satellite, it would appear to have been successfully “repaired” several days ago:


    On 04/13/16 an additional change in the solar panel position was made.This change has improved the problems we were seeing in the 37V GHz channel.

  4. Snow White Says:

    The gremlins have returned to the NSIDC’s sea ice data:


    On April 20, the 37V GHz channel started to produce bad data again. Thus, data from April 20 onward should not be used until further notice.

  5. astrostevo Says:

    Dunno but its very clear where its trending and it isn’t good.

    Its a matter of mere years before we get a planet with only one hemisphere boasting an icecap sometimes – and for periods that will then grow longer as it changes as seen from space and felt in the cost of immense misery on the ground in so many lives.

  6. The minimum ice is driven by so many variables, can not make any prediction at this stage, just impossible to call. Look at the winter of 2012, prior to the record minimum. Max Extent hit 14.71 (https://ads.nipr.ac.jp/vishop/vishop-extent.html?N) which is in line with average extent of the 1990s. No one then was saying we were in for a record minimum that year. Unpredictable weather events drove the low in August/September. At this point, all one can say is we might hit a record low or we might not. Let’s talk in September when we know how this year plays out.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: