Radio Host – Is Flooding God’s Judgement on Texas “Sodomites”?

May 29, 2015

Radio Host Bryan Fischer thinks it’s a reasonable hypothesis. More research needed.

Go ahead and laugh. This is only going to get louder as things keep changing.

Advertisements

22 Responses to “Radio Host – Is Flooding God’s Judgement on Texas “Sodomites”?”


  1. Wow. First time I ever heard of radio Host Bryan Fischer. Maybe check his ratings and you might see he has all of 14 listeners.

    You fellows have found at least one instance there of conspiracy theory even more loony than the notion that there’s a giant sinister plot where skeptic climate scientists get marching orders and heaps of cash in Exxon’s / Koch’s conference rooms. But it is probably still just par against the stuff put out by 911Truthers, ChemTrail believers and creation science believers….

    • dumboldguy Says:

      Russell tries to deflect us from pointing out the truth about AGW deniers like him by pointing to people who are even “crazier”.

      Nice try, Russell, but as “crazy” as they may be, they are at least honest “believers” about what they spout rather than lying whores like you and all the other paid-by-Heartland deniers.

      And you really need to stop talking about “skeptic climate scientists” also. There are no such animals on the planet anymore, only AGW “deniers” who may have once been scientists but now “get marching orders and heaps of cash in Exxon’s / Koch’s conference rooms” (just like you except that you are not and never have been a scientist and have no real standing to even be here spouting your crap).


      • “…deniers .. lying whores … paid-by-Heartland deniers … who may have once been scientists but now ‘get marching orders and heaps of cash in Exxon’s / Koch’’s conference rooms’ …”

        Just eats you alive that you can’t prove a word of that nor can you apparently choose one single GelbspanFiles.com blog post and name the “lies” within it. I have to assume you never even watched Monckton’s video all the way through to see how he imploded the “deniers” talking point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSVI-EdgLr4#t=818

        Introspection time for you again, friend. As you’ve readily seen, I read AGW material, I jump straight into ClimateCrocks, MotherJones, DailyKos, I slog through videos by Oreskes, John Mashey & others, quoting ’em verbatim and linking to all that without fail…………. while you are petrified to read just a few paragraphs of skeptic material or watch skeptic videos. What can you possibly be afraid of within that material? Why would you not welcome the opportunity to at least speak with authority on the material instead of just guessing on the content? Are you afraid of being emancipated from an ideology, perhaps, discovering that the people you call heroes have been less than honest with you this whole time, and that people will condemn you for not undertaking elemental due diligence when you could have so long ago?

        • MorinMoss Says:

          Monckton has been shredded time & again by Peter Hadfield aka Potholer54.
          Some years back, Willard Watts agreed to an online debate between Hadfield & Monckton and all the WUWT faithful were aglee at the idea of ‘ees Lawdship decimating the facts & arguments of the alarmist.

          That didn’t go according to script and the Viscount of Bunkum decamped in the middle of the debate for other “pressing concerns” and ignored all entreaties to return.

          And what was so urgent? He made an appearance in Hawaii where he got a lot of applause for mocking Obama and saying that he’d applied for a Hawaiian birth certificate and would consider running for office.

        • dumboldguy Says:

          Oh, look! More BS from Russell that I missed yesterday. It’s cold and rainy here in NO VA so I’m not outside and therefore swinging by the computer more often.

          Russell babbles on about something “eating me alive”? No great whites, grizzlies, or crocodiles here, so I’m a bit confused. He goes on about his mainly unvisited GelbspanFiles.com blog and asks me to name the “lies” within one post. Off the top of my head, there have been multiple lies there regarding the Oregon Project Petition, the biggest being that Russell has touted it as having been signed by 31,000+ “scientists”, which it was decidedly NOT, as anyone can see for themselves by visiting the Project website.

          As far as watching any of Lord Monkey’s videos “to the end”, no sane person would waste the time. I DID watch the last ten minutes of the one cited, and saw no evidence of Monkey “imploding” anything but the idea that he has any business at all commenting on climate change, He is a buffoon.

          Russell thumps his chest and brags about how “reads AGW material, jumps straight into ClimateCrocks, MotherJones, DailyKos, slogs through videos by Oreskes, John Mashey & others, quoting ’em verbatim and linking to all that without fail” I call bullshit on you Russell—-I do not READILY see that you do any of that—-you never, repeat, NEVER talk any of the science there but just keep singing “prove it, prove, prove it” and repeating nebulous denier talking points.

          And Russell gets carried away babbling about how I am “…petrified to read just a few paragraphs of skeptic material or watch skeptic videos”, not knowing that I have books by Singer and Avery, Spencer, and Lomborg sitting almost with arm’s reach right now. I have read them all, along with much other denier material, and I’ve read the preface to the paperback edition of The Great Global Warming Blunder by Spencer many times more for sheer entertainment. It is 2-1/2 pages of self-serving crybaby whining and denier bullshit of the highest order. And that’s me “speaking authoritatively” based on my training in science, education, psychology, and logical thinking, all areas you are weak in (although you DO have a minimal understanding of propaganda writing).

          Your last paragraph is not worth responding to beyond saying that IMO you are becoming more desperate or more deluded as time goes on. And I will YET AGAIN ask you to engage us in a discussion of the science behind the exponential decline in Arctic sea ice over the last 30+ years. Here’s the video clip again—-talk to us about its meaning. To remind you:

          “What can you possibly be afraid of within that material? Why would you not welcome the opportunity to at least speak with authority on the material? Are you afraid of being emancipated from an ideology, perhaps, discovering that the people you call heroes have been less than honest with you this whole time?”


  2. WOW… I think that is all I can say. Stupidity apparently has no bounds…. WOW.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: