In Massachusetts, Voting up Wind Turbines

December 17, 2013


In the Denio-verse, wind turbines are evil giants, purveyors of herpes and headaches, that upend cars miles away.  In the real world? Neighbors who know them, like them. When they notice them.
In Massachusetts, where public school students recently scored far above their peers in other states in science and math, and among the world’s leaders – wind turbines keep winning elections.

The Green Mile:

It’s happened again, this time in Plymouth. Once again, an effort to limit wind turbines was put before voters, citing hazy “health” concerns, and once again clean energy has won in a landslide.

The Plymouth Town Meeting on Saturday rejected a de facto ban on new wind turbines:

If approved, this article would have limited the construction of wind turbines to two overlay districts – one at the Camelot Industrial Park, the other along Commerce Way – and would have modified the required setbacks and the total height allowed. Opponents of the article suggested that if it were approved no additional wind turbines could be located in town.

Town Meeting Rep. Simon Thomas, part owner of the Camelot Wind turbine, said that Plymouth was already the toughest place in New England to try and get a permit for a new turbine.

The article would’ve required a two-thirds supermajority to pass, but didn’t even come close to a simple majority, losing 49-68. The clear defeat for turbine opponents comes just weeks after the Plymouth Zoning Board rejected Stop & Shop’s request to build a wind turbine, citing the dangers of an I think I might be able to hear it pandemic and don’t forget deadly shadows.

The Plymouth vote comes on the heels of similar election results over the last few months in the nearby towns of Fairhaven and Falmouth. Falmouth elected officials put a plan to tear down the town’s wind turbines before voters, who rejected it by a nearly 2-to-1 margin. And in Fairhaven, voters chose a pro-reality candidate for Board of Health over an turbine hysteria candidate, also by a nearly 2-to-1 margin.

While elected officials keep trying to pander to the vocal handful of wind hypochondriacs who show up to complain at meetings, Massachusetts voters continue to strongly support local wind energy projects. How many times to do they have to send that message at the ballot box before it sinks in?

But now, for the first time, a study by psychologists, engineers and built environment experts at The University of Nottingham, has found no link between the ‘measured’ level of noise from small and micro  and reports of ill health.

The research could be helpful in prompting pre-emptive action in future planning applications for small and medium sized wind turbines to help reassure those concerned about the impact of small and micro wind turbines on their wellbeing.

Midlands survey

This collaborative study involved researchers from the Faculty of Engineering as well as Social Sciences and was funded by the UK Energy Research Centre . It is the first project to examine how personality, and specifically ‘negative orientated personality’ (NOP), affects reported levels of non-specific symptoms like headache, sleeplessness, stomach upsets and general malaise. It was carried out as a public survey of 1270 households within 500 metres of eight 0.6kW micro-turbines and within 1 km of four 5kW wind turbines in two Midlands cities.

Dr Claire Lawrence from the University’s School of Psychology said: “We measured the actual noise from the turbines and used  modelling software that helped us to predict how much sound is actually heard by those living in the vicinity. We found there was no relationship between the ‘real’ level of noise and reports of ill health. ”

The personality traits measured from the 138 returned questionnaires were neuroticism, (propensity to be more anxious, to take longer to revert to an equilibrium), negative affectivity (the propensity to feel ), and also frustration intolerance (sensitivity towards frustrations, discomforts and annoyances).

The researchers concluded that the people who live near a turbine and can hear some noise, did not suffer more non-specific health symptoms than people who could not in reality hear the same sound. The study indicated that generally it is not the turbine noise per se that is causing the symptoms. Indeed, for those individuals who did not score highly on these negative orientated personality traits, reporting hearing the sound was not associated with symptoms. This association was only evident for those higher in these traits.

While there is general public support for renewable energy, and indeed the majority of respondents in the reported study were positive about wind energy in general, it is acknowledged that individuals are often more negative when faced with the prospect of having wind turbines near their homes. This research is the first study ever carried out to show the relationship between personality and perception of wind turbine noise in relation to a so-called ‘‘. The results could be significant in informing local authority decision-making on the increasing number of planning applications for wind turbines across the UK.

No big surprise here. As I’ve reported before,  your windbaggers are nutjobs, and should not be allowed to hold sharp objects, much less dictate policy. They are being defeated everywhere sensible people have the chance to make their voices heard.


33 Responses to “In Massachusetts, Voting up Wind Turbines”

  1. kingdube Says:

    Wow…here is how it can be fixed. Let’s assonate KingDube. That will help. The shit he espouses is untenable.

    Even as the Earth is now cooling.

    And all of your asshole thinking is falling apart.

    Let’s get him!! Now while we can!!

    • What does the verb “to assonate” mean?  To deem as an ass?  Well, it couldn’t happen to anyone more deserving, could it?

      • dumboldguy Says:

        LOL I had the exact same thought when I read it. If we were standing in that magic spot in the UK with the temperature record going back to 1659 that PROVES the earth has turned the corner and is cooling, we would be in 127.3% agreement (and The Assonator would have no problem with that math).

      • dumboldguy Says:

        PS Did you notice the elegance and eloquence in “espouses untenable shit” and “asshole thinking”?

        Perhaps the latter is an obscure reference to that ancient Greek play (name escapes me—written by Aristophanes?) in which some learned ones bend over and study small and inconsequential things on the ground closely with their eyes while their anal orifice observes and “thinks” about all else? If that is so, could it mean that The Dube is actually self-aware enough to be speaking of himself? Hmmmmmmm…….Naaah, not possible.

  2. kingdube Says:


    Please don’t give my identity away to these fools (I mean “useful idiots” to the scam of alarm).

    They don’t know the nature of their usefulness.

    It’s reasonable to assume that they’re just unthinking idiots who would like to believe that reality conforms to their magical preference.

    Evidence doesn’t matter to these people. Revenge, though, does appear to be part of their program.

    If my thinking were so bankrupt, I too would look for some (any) alternative.

    Please help me hide from these revengeful people. I’m not the cause of their pain.

    • Oh, those poor innocent children! The turbines are in plain sight from the playground, just to hire a few more teachers and to burn a little less coal.

      • greenman3610 Says:

        Laker Elementary School nearby in Michigan’s thumb backs up to a large, utility scale array of turbines, and has its own 90s vintage turbine spinning away on the school grounds.
        Inside, computer displays give moment to moment readouts of how much electricity is being produced from the turbine, and the school’s solar panels. The devices are the centerpiece of an educational program centered around the physics of energy and emerging renewable technology.
        The wind turbines in the area provide a source of revenue for local farmers, improving roads, schools, and science programs like this. It’s a model for rural development somewhat more attractive than the “build more prisons” idea that’s been so popular among Republican governors and legislators in past decades.

      • The federal government will not institute a “no fly” for national security in the event of a failure, either, unlike Fort Calhoun which has been shut for three years.

  3. markle2k Says:

    “‘negative orientated personality’ (NOP)”, “neuroticism, (propensity to be more anxious, to take longer to revert to an equilibrium), negative affectivity (the propensity to feel negative emotions), and also frustration intolerance (sensitivity towards frustrations, discomforts and annoyances)”, “reporting hearing the sound was not associated with symptoms.”

    That’s what the rest of us call “whiners”, right?

    • greenman3610 Says:

      a whiner often has something real, if minor, to complain about.
      in this case, what you have is Glenn Beck addled shut-ins reacting to figments of their imagination.

  4. Here is some more cheerful new. Renewables are the unexpected Christmas gift.’s-climate-action-plan
    For more cinch and less grinch tune in to climatecrocks.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: