Poll: Pols Will Pay Price for Denial

October 22, 2013

Wash Post:

Is it possible to make GOP lawmakers pay a political price for throwing in with the climate science deniers? The League of Conservation Voters is engaged in an interesting experiment designed to answer that question, running ads targeting GOP Senator Ron Johnson and a handful of House GOP lawmakers over their climate denialism.

turtle

Living in an alternative universe.

The group’s operating theory: Denying what science says about threats to the fate of the planet should perhaps be, you know, a tiny bit politically problematic. GOP lawmakers pay a steep price for outsized claims about abortion or immigration. Why not about something as consequential as climate change?

Now the group has done a new poll that, it says, underscores that drawing attention to a public official’s climate science denialism does erode his or her public image. The group’s polling memo is right here. The group polled on Senator Johnson in the Green Bay, WI, media market — a swing area where its ads ran — before and after the ad buy. According to the memo:

52 percent of constituents who definitely recall the ads volunteer unfavorable impressions of Ron Johnson and his record in an open-ended (unprompted) question format, and most of the concerns they express relate directly to the content of the ads.

The memo also reports a 14-point increase in those who feel less favorable towards Johnson based on what they have heard about him; an eight point increase in his job disapproval; and an eight point boost in in constituents believing Johnson is out of step on climate change. (For more on Johnson, and the results the polling found on climate-denying House GOPers, read the whole memo.)

“Denying climate change science is something that, when you put it in front of voters, they stand up and take notice,” top Dem pollster Geoff Garin, who did the survey for the LCV, tells me. “We’re finding that when voters hear about an elected official denying basic climate science, it is consequential in the way they think about that person, both in terms of the issue itself, and in terms of larger conclusions voters draw about whether that official thinks the way they do.”

Below, bullet points from the memo:

The following are a few key examples of the impacts we measured in the media markets where the ads were run:

  • In the Champaign media market, there was a net drop of 11 points in Rodney Davis’ approval rating.
  • In the Green Bay media market, disapproval for Ron Johnson rose by eight points, and negative personal feelings toward Johnson rose by nine points.
  • In the Traverse City and Marquette media markets, Dan Benishek’s net approval rating dropped by 11 points, and there was a 13-point increase in the proportion of constituents who say he is out of step with their views on climate change.
  • For all four incumbents, including Mike Coffman, those who recall the advertising were much more likely to express negative opinions about the incumbent across metrics than those who did not recall the advertising.
  • For all four incumbents, we measured large-scale movement among panelback respondents who were interviewed both before and after the advertising. In Mike Coffman’s district, for example, there was a 13-point jump among panelback respondents in the proportion expressing negative feelings toward him and a 14-point jump among the proportion saying he is too close to big oil.Clearly, these ads, and the topic at the heart of them, have a significant breakthrough quality. The unaided recall of the ads’ messages indicates that the issue of climate change denial has sufficient relevance to be memorable. The changes in broad metrics further indicate that denial of climate science is a politically significant criticism that affects an elected official’s standing with their constituents when he or she is held accountable for it.

4 Responses to “Poll: Pols Will Pay Price for Denial”

  1. MorinMoss Says:

    Unless the Green Tea Party becomes much stronger, I don’t think this will make much different in the near term.
    The last round of gerrymandering has made most Red districts blood red and there are more than a few rightwing loons just waiting to knock out GOP incumbents in primary races.
    The best we can hope for is that the loons will be unpalatable enough that they won’t appeal to the general population but again, gerrymandering takes care of that in many places.

    And with so many states where Republicans have the governorship and the state legislature sewn up, it’s going to be a long struggle.
    And then there’s voter suppression.

    • dumboldguy Says:

      Watch the governor’s race in VA. The TP candidate is trailing badly in the polls in the very reddest areas—the coal country of the southwest part of the state, where the libertarian candidate is doing surprisingly well. It appears that the “red” folks are now starting to give up on the TP loons as well as the establishment Republicans. Once they discover that libertarianism is a romantic but impractical solution to life in the 21st. century, they may complete the circle and appear on the left.


  2. So thats what they are now starting to do in Auz. The green party members are directly blaming Abbot for policy that is aiding the current raging bush fires. Its the way that it has to be done….

    How to talk about global warming (with an Auz accent)
    http://livenews.abc.net.au/Event/NSW_fire_emergency_Day_2/93193702


    • What a terrible reporter, its as if he is claiming that the greens did a crime by connecting bushfires to climate change and that this is “extremist” rhetoric. When the hydrologic cycle increases with rising temperatures caused by global warming, the consequences are clear and have been repeated by scientists for a long time now. I wonder when it will sink in?

      No doubt the media will do what they can to put the blame on some kids who started the fires, and deny that drought conditions have any part of it… and certainly not link it to the real reason…


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: