Iceland’s Renewable Wealth, from Hot Rocks to Cold Desert

October 8, 2013


The Hellisheiði Power Station is the largest geothermal power station in the world. It was just one of the stops we made today in a quick trip across a small country. Southern Iceland is a great place for a primer on the pluses and minuses of renewable energy, in a country that already produces essentially all of its electricity from renewable sources.

At 300 megawatts, the Hellisheiði installation produces a significant fraction of Iceland’s power.  While the plant is very clean, it is not a perfect system. There are emissions of sulphur which acidify local waters, and corrode equipment in nearby areas.  The impact on water supplies is minimal, but measurable.  The local area has a detectable sulphurous odor – something I’ve gotten used to, as it is readily detectable any time you take a shower or use hot water in Reykjavik. Attempts to re-inject contaminated water into the earth have been blamed for small tremors in the local area, so for the moment, there is no solution to the more-annoying-than-dangerous effluent.

Geothermal heat is a resource that is not infinite.  A given site can eventually be tapped out. Carefully managed, the location is expected to continue to produce power for centuries to come.

Further inland, across flat plains of Iceland’s best agricultural zone, one passes hundreds of grazing sheep and the unique Icelandic horses, that we can see already are beginning to show shaggy winter coats.

The fertile volcanic soils gradually give way to a rocky cold desert, sliced by rivers flowing off spring fed lakes and melting glaciers further east.  Here we took a look at the other terms in Iceland’s renewable equation – hydroelectric, the biggest contributor for now, and the new player, wind turbines.

The Burfell Hydroelectric station, 270 megawatts in capacity, is part of a series of 6 stations which produce in total about a gigawatt of power.  Hydro is the workhorse of Iceland’s electrical output, most of which goes to supplying power to multinational ore processing facilities, some very large, which can be seen in the area surrounding the capital.  Nearby, a pair of 1 MW wind turbines are running as part of a project to demonstrate whether wind and hydro can make a well matched pair.  Wind here tends to blow hardest in winter, while the hydro resource is greatest in summer. The two compliment each other well, as hydro, even in the off season, can be readily matched to strong-but-variable wind, to keep power supplies steady.

One of the two turbines has heating elements to dampen icing on the blades, the other has no such heating – an attempt to observe the difference in icing impact on safety and power production. As luck would have it, warmer weather since the turbines were installed in the last year has made ice buildup rare so far.


Wind turbine in Burfell’s cold desert

The takeaway – there are no free lunches. But some of them are a lot cheaper and more nutritious than others.

For now, Iceland’s total production is relatively small, on the order of a few gigawatts total. There is talk of an undersea cable connecting to Scotland, and the wider European grid, so far not seen as economic.  Yet, Iceland’s wind resource may be immense, and it already produces more than enough hydro and geothermal power for its small population.  One proposed way forward is using cheap renewables to split seawater into hydrogen, to supply a global H2 economy, but that is some way off, if it ever develops at all.

Each nation has its own set of resources and obstacles – the engineering challenge is to best manage those resources to create needed power and still meet the goal of decarbonizing over coming decades. Iceland is an important laboratory where useful experience will be gained on the way to a renewably powered planet.


Above and below: Phil Coates sets up a shot in a barren cold desert landscape



Near the reservoir of Burfell Hydro station, Phil Coates sets a camera


Modern, but lightly travelled, road in south central Iceland


6 Responses to “Iceland’s Renewable Wealth, from Hot Rocks to Cold Desert”

  1. jimbills Says:

    Peter – I just want to say I really appreciate these journalist-style entries. Great stuff.

  2. redskylite Says:

    I too appreciate this entry and am interested in Iceland’s commitments to renewable energy. Thank you

  3. Bruce Miller Says:

    Now that the gateway to U.S. warring and plundering lesser countries for their oil has been closed at Syria by the Russian/Chinese/Iranian/ U.N. collusion, America will have to give in and give away the Oil intensive Jet plane flights for Electric bullet trains? practical, sustainable, life styles?

  4. Large-scale conventional hydro, with the massive energy storage of the water behind the dam and extremely rapid response, is the natural complement to intermittent and/or variable sources of electric generation.

    Without such storage, intermittent supplies are problematic.  I had hopes for CAES some years ago, but the ISEPA effort appears to have terminated without any followup (sandstone aquifers don’t make good air tanks, or so it seems) and the Cleveland-area effort to use an abandoned limestone mine for air storage has been put on hold as well.

    The alternative is NG-fired gas turbines, and Art Berman makes a very good case that our glut of gas is both physically and financially unsustainable.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: