Remember Who Lied to You
July 3, 2013
Sometimes Cenk Uygur is a little too bombastic for me, but he hits the nail squarely here.
Climate Denial Crock of the Week
with Peter Sinclair
-
-
Pages
Links
Climate Science Legal Defense Fund
-
Recent Posts
- Dems Release Climate Plan, But is it Enough?
- The Weekend Wonk: A Little Known Energy Storage Tech
- Music Break: Dylan + All Stars – My Back Pages
- Coal Rollers: Big Nations Aiding Fossil Fuels with Recovery Cash
- Ex-Ford CEO on Tesla Growth
- “This is Basic Science”: Last Sane Republican’s Primal Scream
- Music Break: Kasey Anderson – The Dangerous Ones
- Corona Crisis Craters Coal, Rapidly Ramping Renewables Romp
- Climate Extremes: Jeff Berardelli on Dust Cloud and Arctic Heat
- CBS News: Koala Extinction in NSW by 2050
- “Left in the Ground”. Another Major Oil Write-Down
- DOE: Back to the Future with Coal
- Insurers, Homeowners, Feel Climate Bite
- New Battery Tech: More Avenues to Carbon-Free
- To Tree, or Not to Tree. That is Not the Question
Archives
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
Blogroll
- A Few Things Ill Considered
- AGW Observer
- Clear Climate Code
- Climate Change Ireland
- Climate Charts
- Climate Place
- Climate Progress
- Climate Victory
- ClimateSight
- Deep Climate
- Deltoid
- Denial Depot
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Glimpse Science Network
- James Empty Blog
- Mind of Dan
- More Grumbine Science
- OilPrice.com
- Only In It for the Gold
- Open Mind
- Our Changing Climate
- Planet Experts
- Post Normal Times
- RealClimate
- Rocky Mountain Institute
- Scholars and Rogues
- Shale Gas Bulletin Ireland
- Skeptical Science
- Solar Power Now
- Terra Alert
- The Cost of Energy
- The Way Things Break
- Yale Climate Forum Playlist
July 3, 2013 at 3:14 pm
unavailable in the UK
from the one visible image, looks like xxi century televangelism 🙂
July 3, 2013 at 3:33 pm
You would have enjoyed http://seven50.org/ conference last month where the climate analysts of south Florida met the developers and tried to get them to think past 50 years.
I attended but did not speak. I was appalled that the most sea level rise they would consider in planning was 2 feet by 2060 and then nothing after 2060. They would not agree that 2 feet by 2060 might mean 4 or 5 feet by 2100.
So they are planning to increase the population of South Florida by 3 million by that time, and they are planning all sorts of new investments to make as much money as possible from the region.
I can only assume that they secretly want to maximize profit before the inevitable drowning takes place.
They would talk about mitigation (but not decarbonization) and adaptation, but not a word about evacuation. Florida Power and Light (FPL) was in the room and among other things talked about how they are going to expand their nuclear facilities at Turkey Point.
Talk about Risk! Can you spell Fukushima?
July 3, 2013 at 3:36 pm
Here is a photo of the Turkey Point Nuclear facility. Even more vulnerable than Fukushima. http://enformable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Turkey-Point-Nuclear-Power-Plant.jpg
July 3, 2013 at 8:44 pm
Don’t attribute to evil what can be explained by stupidity.
July 3, 2013 at 10:30 pm
Expanding the nuclear plant at Turkey Point is a positive response to climate change. We need more electricity to decarbonize, which is only worth doing if that electricity is not itself carbon-dioxide-generating.
And Turkey Point has been directly hit by a huge hurricane without safety problems. Talk about safe! Proven convincingly.
July 3, 2013 at 3:44 pm
Only a little too bombastic? Apart from the fact that he’s right on pretty much everything, I can’t stand the guy 🙂
July 3, 2013 at 4:34 pm
Fun fact: Cenk Uygur’s son’s name is Prometheus Maximus Uygur.
July 3, 2013 at 10:48 pm
Fortunately for her, his daughter is Joy Helena Uygur. Dare I suspect his wife drew a line?
July 4, 2013 at 5:39 am
My wife drew the line the first time when I wanted to name our son Reno. You are probably right.
July 3, 2013 at 4:50 pm
Yes, we are all going to see who lied.
BTW, what Fukushima demonstrated is that even when the most extreme and heretofore unimaginable natural disaster hits several nuclear power stations, there was not a single death associated with nuclear radiation. That’s how safe they are.
Had the same disaster occurred with coal, gas, hydro, photovoltaic or wind power generation, there would almost certainly have been deaths directly related to those mediums of power generation.
July 11, 2013 at 5:45 am
Yes, you’re absolutely right, dube, those wind slicks and leaks of you, know, sunbeams can be really serious.
Are you serious, dude? Nuclear reactors are not an option for a world of deteriorating climate and collapsing economies–on its huge water use alone, let alone all the other unsolvable problem. Fossil fuels cause millions of deaths a year including vast numbers of wildlife of all kinds, and are creating a global ecological catastrophe unparalleled in human history. Wind and solar, on the other hand, are harmless forms of energy that have the power to save civilization. To be against them is to be against science, rational thought, and a stable civilization.
July 3, 2013 at 7:00 pm
“The uploader has not made this video available in your country”
So wish I could see this. Please could a friendly soul mirror the vid and make it available in the UK? Actually I’m not even sure if that is possible. And certainly don’t do it if it breaks copyright laws – but if it can be done, I’d be most grateful.
July 4, 2013 at 3:55 am
I’ll have a go. I’ll post the link.
July 4, 2013 at 4:19 am
For those who can’t access it, try my mirror.
July 4, 2013 at 5:24 am
uknowipeaksense – works perfectly and is well worth watching. Twice 🙂
Thank you!
July 8, 2013 at 2:12 pm
Thanks for the viewable version. I’m subscribed to their feed and somehow missed this one. I try to watch everything with Carla Santa Maria in it as well.