The Weekend Wonk: Sea Level Potholes and Speedbumps

March 30, 2013

A year ago I interviewed Oceanographer Josh Willis at AGU,(above) in regard to the sudden “pot-hole” in sea level rise that was then being observed – a sudden drop that had the denis-sphere all atwitter – “flaws in global warming theory” etc..

Josh did a nice job explaining how the large La Nina event of the previous year had actually moved so much water from ocean to land, that it was actually causing a temporary dip in sea level numbers.
Incredible? Now, the process has reversed, and instead of a “pothole”, we are seeing a “speed bump” in sea level, explained below by Skeptical Science.

Check the video, and if you at least skim the item below, you’ll get an increased appreciation for our top tier scientists, and how, while they will tell you they don’t know everything, they know a lot – and we do well to pay attention to expert analysis, rather than, say, bloggers with high school degrees and an agenda.

Rob Painting in SkepticalScience:

The Earth is warming which is driving the ongoing thermal expansion of sea water and the melt of land-based ice. Both processes are raising sea level, but superimposed upon this long-term sea level rise are what scientists at  NASA JPL (Jet Propulsion Lab) have coined, “potholes and speed bumps on the road to higher seas“. (See their follow-up paper – The 2011 La Niña: So strong, the oceans fell, Boening [2012]).

Since mid-2011 a giant “speed bump” has been encountered. In roughly the last two years the global oceans have risen approximately 20 millimetres (mm), or  10 mm per year. This is over three times the rate of sea level rise during the time of satellite-based observations (currently 3.18 mm per year), from 1993 to the present.


Figure 1 – mean sea level (in centimetres) since 1993 obtained by satellite altimetry observations. Annual and semi-annual signals have been removed to reveal the long-term trend. The glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) of 0.3mm per year is added to account for the slumping of ocean basins. Image from the AVISO website.

So does this mean land-based ice is undergoing a remarkably abrupt period of disintegration? While possible, it’s probably not the reason for the giant speed bump.

Pot Holes and Speed Bumps

The largest contributor to the year-to-year (short-term) fluctuation in sea level is the temporary exchange of water mass between the land and ocean. This land-ocean exchange of water is coupled to the natural Pacific Ocean phenomenon called the El NiñoSouthern Oscillation (ENSO) – which affects weather on a global scale. (See Ngo-Duc [2005]Nerem [2010]Llovel [2011]Cazenave [2012] & Boening [2012] – linked to above)

Figure 2 – Global sea level with the long-term rise (trend) removed. Sea level (blue line), compared to the Multivariate ENSO Index (a measure of the state and scale of ENSO) in red. Negative values represent the La Niña (cold) phase, and positive values the El Niño (warm) phase. Image adapted from the University of Colorado (CU) Sea Level Research Group.

The ocean, through strong evaporation in the tropics, is the source of the water that is being exchanged. Each occurrence of ENSO has its own unique set of characteristics, butLa Niña is typically (although not always) associated with greater-than-normal rainfall and snow over land,  and a consequent sharp, but temporary, fall in global sea level (pot holes) as the continents soak up the extra water. With El Niño we often see greater-than-normal rainfall and snow concentrated over the oceans. Combined with the drainage of water back into the oceans, this causes an abrupt, but temporary, rise in sea level (speed bumps).

Even though El Niño has not developed over the last two years, it appears that a lot of water has drained from the major continental basins over the last (almost) two years – which has created this giant speed bump. This seems to be supported by the latestMultivariate ENSO Index data which shows a progression from strongly negative values (La Niña) in 2011, to mildly positive ones in 2013. Despite current conditions not being classified as El Niño in a technical sense, this change should have led to drying of the continents – as is usual when the weather moves away from a La Niña phase. But that’s not the whole story either.

The loss of land-based ice is not a smooth progression. It’s a common misconception that the great ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica are losing more ice year-upon-year, but this isn’t quite correct. Ice mass loss is indeed accelerating if we look at say a 10-20 year period, however the ice mass balance is obtained by weighing the snowfall gain on the top of the ice sheet, against the ice loss, through glacier calving, at sea level. This tells us whether the ice sheets have gained ice (mass), or lost it, in any given year. Even though the ice sheets are losing ice at a greater rate over time, there is a great deal of variation from year-to-year (see Van den Broeke [2011]). This mass balance variability is illustrated in Figure 3 below.

Fig 3 – Mass balance estimate of: a) the Greenland ice sheet, and b): the Antarctic ice sheet. While these estimates have been refined in the intervening period since this paper was published, note the very substantial year-to-year variation in ice sheet mass. Image from Rignot (2011).

Although small in absolute sea level terms, relative to the short-lived land-ocean water exchange, this fluctuation in ice mass balance  can either add to, or diminish, the multi-year variability. For a scale comparison; meltwater from the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica have added an estimated 11 mm of total sea level rise to the oceans between 1992-2011 (Shepherd [2012]) – about the same amount of sea level rise experienced in the last year alone.

Expertise Matters, Which is Why Contrarians Constantly Mangle ClimateScience

As sea level was going through its dramatic plunge in 2010-2011 we saw a number of contrarians demonstrate their utter lack of understanding of the processes that influence sea level. For instance WUWT, the  popular contrarian blog, featured a post by John Kehr on this topic where he wrote:

“…a significant drop in the global sea level highlights serious flaws in the IPCC projections.


The fact that CO2 levels have been higher in the last 5 years that have the lowest rate of rise than the years with lower CO2 levels is a strong indicator that the claims of CO2 are grossly exaggerated.”

Neither of these claims is true. Sea level rise is currently at the upper bound of projections made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and increased CO2concentrations in the atmosphere don’t magically make La Niña and El Niño disappear – pot holes and speed bumps will continue.

As with all things in life actual expertise matters.

Deeper Pot Holes and Steeper Speed Bumps?

Examining Figure 1 it is very clear that the last pothole and speed bump are quite unlike anything else in the observational record. The sheer size of the two stand out like a sore thumb. Whether this is just some blip or a sign of things to come is not yet known.

It is, however, useful to point out that, as the oceans and Earth become warmer, theatmosphere is able to hold and redistribute more water vapour. Because this increased capacity rises at a rate faster than the warming itself (the Clausius-Clapeyron relation), we expect to see greater rainfall or snow at times when moisture is converged, and less rainfall or snow when moisture diverges.

This suggests that we are likely, for a time, to observe larger La Niña potholes – when more intense rainfall and snow is dumped over the continents, and larger El Niño speed bumps – when more intense rainfall and snow is focused over the oceans, and the continents become drier.

This enhanced capacity to move water from ocean to land (and vice-versa) via atmospheric warming may be a piece of the puzzle, but it doesn’t explain the dramatic change in variability over the last few years. It may be connected to an inferred global brightening (increased solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface) in the last 5-6 years (Klimont [2013]) – a phenomenon which would accelerate the global water cycle (Wild [2011]) – or it could be something else entirely. No doubt it’s a subject currently under scientific investigation.

Sea Level: A Long, Lumpy, Uphill Road

While it is likely that the record 2012 summer melt season on the Greenland ice sheet has shed more ice into the ocean, there’s no evidence yet to suggest that either that, or ice loss from Antarctica, has added to this giant speed bump in any significant manner.

Sea level is already committed to rise many metres over the coming centuries because of the concentration of greenhouse gases humans have put into the atmosphere. The warming from this will enforce the continued disintegration of land-based ice, and thethermal expansion of seawater (Meehl [2012]Foster & Rohling [2013]). This uphill road to higher sea level is bound to be long and lumpy one – with many potholes and speed bumps along the way.


6 Responses to “The Weekend Wonk: Sea Level Potholes and Speedbumps”

  1. Excellent post, thanks!!

  2. rayduray Says:

    Alternative news site Truth-Out has an item today about the politics of global warming:

    Headline: “Propaganda, Self-Censorship and Climate Change”

  3. I would hope that Sea Levels continue to rise. Our orbital parameters are very close to MIS-11.

  4. takver Says:

    Great interview and explanation of the sealevel ‘pothole’ while it was happening. excellent post

  5. Rob Murphy Says:

    A speed bump is something that slows you down, like a pothole. That’s what it’s designed to do. Really bad metaphor, otherwise excellent article.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: