How Stupid Does Cato Institute think Congress Is? Oh, right….
October 15, 2012
A seasoned DC observer flags this one:
Apparently the (right wing “think” tank) Cato Institute is set to release into the election campaign circus a report titled “ADDENDUM: Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States,” which mimics in layout and format the national climate assessment report with the same title released by the White House and the USGCRP in 2009. We have heard that this report was coming, but apparently it is now to be publicly released and no doubt is intended to be taken up and pushed by the denial machine.A prepublication version of the report, dating from earlier this summer i think, is downloadable at http://www.cato.org/pubs/Global-Climate-Change-Impacts.pdf. Not sure how this compares with what will be released now. This report is their response to the 2009 ‘official’ assessment, and it is designed to look just like the original report in terms of the cover and organization, all the way down to type face and the way figures are laid out, as well as the title.
My first reaction was, who cares? This is another “insided the beltway” report that will never see the light of day.
But, another well informed insider tells me:
There is a reason why Cato is putting it out now. It is not so the average person will read it. It will be handed to Republican candidates who can tout the latest science in attacking the Administration’s efforts to address climate change; and it will be used by the Republicans in the lame duck session as justification for eviscerating funding for climate change.
Climate Denial Crock of the Week 
October 15, 2012 at 9:55 pm
I did a brief post on this report at SkS a few months back. The entire purpose of the report is to argue against the need to reduce CO2 emissions, but in the process they unwittingly admit that CO2 emissions pose a threat to humans.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/michaels-epa-endangerment-finding.html
Interesting that the temperature record is on the bottom of the USGCRP cover, whereas I can’t tell what the blue/red bars on the bottom of the Cato cover are supposed to represent. ENSO or PDO maybe?
Regardless, it’s pretty pathetic that they’re trying to disguise their ideologically biased rubbish as a real scientific report.
October 15, 2012 at 10:47 pm
Not so much as pathetic, Dana, but SOP for the GOPeabaggers. Truly venal. They have proven BEYOND a shadow of doubt they care not one DAMN bit about the environment;;;only the part they can dig up and make money from.
October 16, 2012 at 12:01 am
I watched how the Sessions and Inhofe ran a show-trial using cherry picked data as a thin veil to justify their position in Senate committee hearing “Update on the Latest Climate Change Science and Local Adaptation Measures.”, Wednesday, August 1, 2012
They basically just bulldozed their way through the proceedings, ignoring facts presented by two expert witnesses, using John Christy as their hired shill witness. They spent more time introducing him with his supposed credentials than actually listening to him. Sickening whitewash.
Watch the archived webcast here:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_id=c0293eca-802a-23ad-4706-02abdbf7f7c3
Inhofe Welcomes Senate Back to Global Warming Debate – Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBuREuABX6s
Oil-soaked democracy in action.
October 16, 2012 at 1:49 pm
There should have been 49 climate scientists there to counter Christie’s testimony to give an accurate sampling of expert opinion.
October 16, 2012 at 2:30 pm
Absolutely, but it still wouldn’t have carried any more weight – the Republicans had a majority and to hell with reason.
October 15, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Reblogged this on obama '12 – ma metrowest so. and commented:
They are relying on the fact that we can’t tell the difference between real and faked science and studies. Are we this gullible?
October 15, 2012 at 11:51 pm
Probably the same guys who want to control the internet for copyright reasons…
October 15, 2012 at 11:53 pm
Hope they don’t complain about China…
October 16, 2012 at 7:02 am
The post lacks impact for those who are unfamiliar with USA congressional niceties.
October 16, 2012 at 10:00 am
Wow, this is pretty low. Interesting that the groups like Cato appear to end up being the source of some climate myths. Their BS reports make it to politicians, who then spread the myths among themselves and to the media.
October 16, 2012 at 3:38 pm
Of course when Michaels is ensnared in a web like this what else can a man do but produce such *****. Michaels is near bottom left and Cato near centre top.
October 17, 2012 at 4:18 am
[…] […]
October 17, 2012 at 9:38 am
[…] Stupid Does Cato Institute Think Congress Is? Oh..Right. The story from Climate Denial Crock Of The Week; here’s an excerpt: ”A seasoned DC observer flags this one: Apparently the (right […]
October 17, 2012 at 10:12 am
[…] Stupid Does Cato Institute Think Congress Is? Oh..Right. The story from Climate Denial Crock Of The Week; here’s an excerpt: ”A seasoned DC observer flags this one: Apparently the (right wing […]