Is Nero a Hero to Climate Deniers?

December 14, 2011

LA Times:

…it’s hard to believe that even a tyrant as petty and murderous as Nero would be foolish enough to watch the burning of his city-state and do nothing about it. But we Americans are.

Climate change is no longer a theoretical concept to be debated at symposiums by science nerds. It is happening right here, right now. Thirteen of the warmest years on record worldwide have happened in the past 15 years. In the U.S., 12 weather-related disasters this year have caused in excess of $1 billion in damage each, a record, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Although many expected the global economic downturn to slow the output of greenhouse gases, emissions actually have been accelerating at an alarming rate, growing 5.9% in 2010 — the biggest jump since 2003. The American response? Fiddling around.

Susan Lewis in the Winchester Star: 

Today, with China’s ascendancy on the horizon, our political leaders are calling for more students to pursue science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) careers. They understand that America’s ability to compete in the global economy depends heavily on our technical expertise.

How disappointing, then, that many Republican leaders disparage science and the work of scientists when it clashes with their ideology or merely suits their political goals. This attack on science has dangerous consequences, threatening to undermine science education, critical government funding for basic science research, and public sentiment toward science.

In 2009, a group of 18 prominent scientific groups headed by the American Association for the Advancement of Science sent Congress a letter stressing the clear evidence for climate change. Yet 94 of the 100 GOP members of Congress elected in 2010 either deny that global warming is real or have pledged opposition to any effort to mitigate it. When George Stephanopoulos asked House Speaker John Boehner what the Republican plan was to deal with carbon emissions, he replied, “George, the idea that carbon dioxide is a carcinogen, that it’s harmful to our environment, is almost comical.” Boehner’s apparent confusion would be comical if scientific illiteracy didn’t carry potentially dire consequences.

The anti-science streak is so strong among Republican presidential contenders that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently called it “mind-boggling.” The majority of the candidates, including Ron Paul, Michelle Bachman, Rick Santorum, and Rick Perry, don’t accept evolution, the bedrock of modern biology. “Can you imagine a company of any size in the world where the CEO said ‘oh, I don’t believe in science’?” Bloomberg asked the audience at a Columbia University economics forum.

7 Responses to “Is Nero a Hero to Climate Deniers?”

  1. neilrieck Says:

    Nero blamed the burning of Rome on those pesky Christians (a convenient lie). History will blame “climate change inaction” on Canadian and American Conservatives. In fact, many future history books will claim this inaction was a crime against humanity.

    • greenman3610 Says:

      history will indeed record that – which is why I named this series “Climate Deniers” – I’m not one that apologizes for using that label, and I will never walk that back. There is already terrible damage baked into the cake by the cult of climate criminals.

  2. Martin_Lack Says:

    What the GOP needs is an Anti-Tea-Party-Party. You know, a grassroots popular rebellion with people waving banners saying thing like “Not in my name!” and “I believe in Science!“. In a parallel universe it may well exist. Unfortunately, in reality, it does not.

    By the way, what do Republicans think of the claim that EU scientists have spotted the Higgs-Boson, the so-called “God particle“? I suppose that is “blasphemy“?

  3. Peter Mizla Says:

    what would one expect from the republican party? it is run by hillbillies and nihilists who have to ‘protect’ freedom.

  4. Pete, you don’t have to apologise for calling climate deniers by their name. They are subverting the title “skeptic” to try and legitimise their anti-science belief structure.

    The sad thing about history is that I will be alive to see a lot of the problems come to pass. My children definitely will. Yet most of the deniers don’t have this on their conscious, they will be long dead and they have children who will start to see the change. Deniers, scared of change in their old age.

  5. adelady Says:

    Tyson, I think belief “structure” sets the bar a bit high. Most of their beliefs are either entirely unrelated or mutually exclusive. (I’m not walking into any shopping mall where I can’t see how the doors work or if there’s any ‘there’ there at the top of the stairs.) . I prefer rag-bag.

    As for the children and grandchildren thing, this always mystifies me. I have no problem speculating, visualising or fantasising what my grandchildren’s grandchildren might be or do or where and how they might live.

    Is it just a failure of imagination on some people’s part? Or are they so unwilling to face the fact that they will die some day that they literally _cannot_ think about what the world might be like when they’re no longer here.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: