Clarifying California’s Drought

March 7, 2014

Working on a piece about the California drought, which is, needless to say, a bit of a moving target, and more so since it has entered the political conversation after being mentioned by President Obama as evidence of climate change. So I was happy to see this clarification by a highly regarded California based expert.

Water expert Peter Gleick on his blog:

In the last few months, as the severe California drought has garnered attention among scientists, policymakers, and media, there has been a growing debate about the links between the drought and climate change. The debate has been marked by considerable controversy, confusion, and opaqueness.

The confusion stems from the failure of some scientists, bloggers, reporters, and others to distinguish among three separate questions. All three questions are scientifically interesting. But the three are different in their nuance, their importance to policy, and their interest to politicians and water managers. Here are the three different questions:

  1. Is the California drought caused by climate change?
  2. Is the California drought, no matter the cause, influenced or affected by climate changes already occurring?
  3. How will climate changes affect future drought risks in California?

These questions are not the same thing. Yet repeatedly, some have asked one question when they thought they were asking a different one. Some have been asked one question and intentionally or accidentally answered a different one. Some have confused an answer to one question as an answer to a different question.

Frankly, the entire discussion has been frustrating for all involved. For the sake of clarity in the future, people involved in this discussion should be clear whether they are asking or answeringquestion #1, #2, or #3, or even another question entirely. In addition, the answers for California may be different than other regions of the U.S. or world.

And to prime the pump, so to speak, here are my thoughts about the answers, with some relevant recent scientific papers listed at the end.

  1. Is the California drought caused by climate change? The “causality” question is a bad question to ask and I wish journalists would stop asking it, but without a doubt it is the most common one I receive. From a scientific perspective, the influence of climate change on current extreme events is a very exciting research topic and there is evidence linking climate change with some specific recent extremes. Nevertheless, I think the current scientific answer to this question for the California drought is neither “yes” nor “no.” We do not know. The current drought, measured by hydrologic variables of precipitation amount, form, location, and timing, is certainly severe, but it does not appear to be statistically significantly different from past droughts in the instrumental or longer-term paleoclimatic record. But here is another key point lost to many. Just because the answer is not “yes” does NOT mean the answer is “no.” Get it?  This subtle difference is often lost: when a scientist says the current drought doesn’t look much different from some past extreme droughts, this says nothing about causality of the current drought.
  2. Is the California drought, no matter the cause, being influenced or affected by climate changes already occurring?  This question is much more interesting than the first one about causality. And I think the answer to this is unambiguously “yes,” but we do not know the net/overall influence of current climate changes. We know that climate is changing and that climate changes influence weather. That “influence” can take many forms: changes in storm patterns, precipitation frequency or intensity, the form of precipitation, and so on. And we know that there are many uncertainties about the nature and extent of these changes. But I say the answer to this specific question is “yes” for one simple reason: current average temperatures in California, like average temperatures worldwide, are higher today than they were in the past century because of human-caused climate change (See Figure 1).These higher temperatures worsen the drought through extra soil moisture loss, altered timing of snowmelt, and decreased reservoir levels from extra evaporation. As a new paper in Nature Climate Change states: “Climate change is adding heat to the climate system and on land much of that heat goes into drying.”[1] It is also possible that climate change has influenced other factors, such as the precipitation regime (with more or less precipitation), but the signal of this influence is still buried in the noise. So I’m not saying the net influence of climate change on the current California drought is unambiguously for the worse or better, just that the influence is real, and the most definitive and well-understood effect (higher temperatures) has decreased current water availability.

3. How will climate changes affect future drought risks in California? There are two answers to this: the first is that climate changes will almost certainly affect California drought risks; but the second is that these effects will be diverse, complicated, and interconnected, and many remain uncertain and exciting topics for current research. Hundreds of research papers have been written about the vulnerability of California water – both the natural hydrology and the complex infrastructure built to manage that hydrology – to climate changes. For the purposes of the current debate around the drought, the question seems to focus on whether future California droughts will be more or less frequent, and more or less severe. There are many factors that go into assessing this question. The scientific literature has an extensive discussion of all of these factors, some of which have been successfully resolved; others remain highly uncertain. For example, we know with a high degree of certainty that temperatures are going to continue to go up and increase evaporative demands for water. We know with a high degree of certainty that the ratio of rain to snow falling in the mountains will rise, snowpack will diminish, and that the timing of runoff will change. We know with a high degree of certainty that sea-level is rising, with effects on coastal aquifers and brackish water ecosystems. As the Trenberth et al. paper mentioned above notes: “Climate change is adding heat to the climate system and on land much of that heat goes into drying. A natural drought should therefore set in quicker, become more intense, and may last longer. Droughts may be more extensive as a result. Indeed, human-induced warming effects accumulate on land during periods of drought because the ‘air conditioning effects’ of water are absent. Climate change may not manufacture droughts, but it could exacerbate them and it will probably expand their domain in the subtropical dry zone.”

But California droughts are also fundamentally linked to the quantities and timing of precipitation, the dynamics of storm formation in the Pacific Ocean, the impacts of climate change on the frequency and intensity of El Niño and La Niña events and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and the behavior of the jet stream as conditions in the Arctic change. These changes are less certain, vitally important to the frequency and intensity of future California drought impacts, and remain serious topics for research and analysis. And as some observers have noted, the risk that future droughts will worsen is more certain for other regions of the world.

The research and the debate over climate change and California droughts will continue. But before commenting, let’s make sure we understand what question is actually being asked, what question should be asked, and what question is actually being answered.

About these ads

15 Responses to “Clarifying California’s Drought”

  1. rayduray Says:

    Do your part, people. Eat more epiphytes.

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2014/03/your-broccoli-is-way-too-thirsty/

    [Aside: Peter, you might get a laugh out of Barry's "comments policy", just below the graphic. :) ]


  2. […] if you are a denier of the science of these things. Let's just pray for an El Nino this year. Clarifying California’s Drought | Climate Denial Crock of the Week Sign in or Register Now to […]


  3. There’s a simple way to determine if a weather event has some relationship to climate change: simple statistics.

    The odds by simple chance for getting a 1 in a 100 year storm in a given year: 1/100

    The odds for getting two independent 100 year weather events in a given year by chance: 1 in 10,000.

    The odds for getting three 100 year weather events in a given year by chance: 1 in a million.

    So if you have three independent weather events (i.e. a flood, a record snowfall, a record high temperature) in a given year, the odds that there is no climate change but only random events is one in a million. So if it isn’t random, then it’s a change in climate driving the weather. Therefore combinations of rare weather events occurring in the same year can be attributed to climate change.


  4. NOAA is predicting a 50% chance of this year being an El Niño year for California which means it will be a wet summer if that’s the case. We all know that if that happens the denialists will be out in full force to say that proves global warming is not real. So it is important to stay focused, and not get sucked into answering the wrong question.

  5. redskylite Says:

    Excellent piece and photos/chart on the Californian drought and climate change:

    Great to see electric school buses are being introduced in that state.

    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/04/3359551/electric-school-bus-2/

  6. Earl Mardle Says:

    I wholly agree about the questions, but I disagree about the answers and the comments made about climate as a driver of weather.

    You quote Trenberth et al as saying that climate change is adding heat to the system. This is clearly false. Human activities are creating conditions where heat from the sun (mostly) is unable to escape to space as easily as it used to. That added heat is affecting the weather through the processes of evaporation, precipitation etc.

    The shift in weather patterns is then forcing a redefinition of the local and global climate.

    We can point to the physics that affects weather, which we can also point to.

    But we cannot point to a “climate” because climate is a statistical tool that aggregates past data about weather and makes predictions about the range of weather, (temperature, precipitation, wind direction and speed etc) that we can expect at a given time.’

    In December it is warm (I live in NZ) and in June it is cold and wet. That is a statement about climate, just as the reverse is true of the US. When the US has enough warm Decembers and 100 year floods follow 100 year droughts, we can say the climate has changed, but it never dictates or even influences the weather.

    There is no mechanism or pathway in the physics for “climate” to play a role. If climate scientists would try to make that clear to the bumfluffs in the media we might at least start to have some informed conversations about what IS going on.


  7. […] 2014/03/07: PSinclair: Clarifying California’s Drought […]


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,643 other followers

%d bloggers like this: