Birds in Crosshairs of Climate Extinction

June 17, 2013

Windbaggers, my name for the fossil fueled fake “grassroots”, tea-party inspired, anti-science activists who oppose renewable energy development, like to talk about the “threat” posed to birds by wind energy.  The first lie you have to believe is that the Koch Brothers and their allies give a damn about birds, or any other living creature.

What science shows it that the greatest threat, not just to birds, but all species, is climate change.

New Scientist:

Between a quarter and a half of all birds, along with around a third of amphibians and a quarter of corals, are highly vulnerable to climate change. These findings have emerged from the most comprehensive assessment to date of the impact of global warming on life. Its results have led some researchers to warn of the need for unprecedented conservation efforts if we don’t cut our emissions.

The new assessment of climate change risk was performed by scientists from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the organisation that produces the Red List of Threatened Species. “When the Red List was invented, it was long before anyone worried about climate change,” says Wendy Foden of the IUCN in Cambridge, UK.

ipccextinc

From IPCC Fourth Assessment, 2007 –  Figure 4.4. Compendium of projected risks due to critical climate change impacts on ecosystems for different levels of global mean annual temperature rise, ΔT, relative to pre-industrial climate (approach and event numbers as used in Table 4.1 and Appendix 4.1). It is important to note that these impacts do not take account of ancillary stresses on species due to over-harvesting, habitat destruction, landscape fragmentation, alien species invasions, fire regime change, pollution (such as nitrogen deposition), or for plants the potentially beneficial effects of rising atmospheric CO2. The red curve shows observed temperature anomalies for the period 1900-2005 (Brohan et al., 2006, see also Trenberth et al., 2007, Figure 3.6). The two grey curves provide examples of the possible future evolution of temperature against time (Meehl et al., 2007, Figure 10.4), providing examples of higher and lower trajectories for the future evolution of the expected value of ΔT. Shown are the simulated, multi-model mean responses to (i) the A2 emissions scenario and (ii) an extended B1 scenario, where radiative forcing beyond the year 2100 was kept constant to the 2100 value (all data from Meehl et al., 2007, Figure 10.4, see also Meehl et al., 2007, Section 10.7).

Red List assessments of extinction risk do consider climate change, but in a limited way. The main tools used in these earlier assessments are species distribution models, says Foden. These map out the climate conditions where a species lives now, then estimate how that liveable area will alter as the climate changes. In many cases, species’ habitable ranges will move and shrink, putting them at risk.

So far, the team has applied their criteria to all birds, amphibians and corals. Species were classed as highly vulnerable if their local climate is changing rapidly, they are sensitive to these changes, and have little ability to adapt or relocate.

The results make for grim reading. Among birds, 24 to 50 per cent of species are highly vulnerable, according to the team’s most optimistic and pessimistic forecasts, as are 22 to 44 per cent of amphibians and 15 to 32 per cent of corals. The figures are similar to those obtained in a 2004 study by Thomas, which estimated that 15 to 37 per cent of species will be “committed to extinction” by 2050 due to climate change (Nature, doi.org/c34wgp). “These are high percentages,” says Thomas.

“Safe” species at risk

What’s more, many of these species are not currently classed as threatened. Foden says that 17 to 41 per cent of birds are highly vulnerable to climate change despite being considered safe by the Red List.

Certain areas are hotspots of threatened species. For instance, the Amazon rainforest contains huge numbers of birds and amphibians that are highly vulnerable to climate change. Most Arctic birds are also highly vulnerable, as are corals in the Caribbean and the Coral Triangle in south-east Asia.

“The moment you start thinking about the magnitude of the conservation programme we might need to put in place, it’s mind-boggling,” Thomas says. Protected areas would need to be much bigger than at present to safeguard relocating species. Also, we would have to intervene to move many species, often to new countries. Such translocations are difficult and expensive, and in any case many countries don’t allow them.

The best thing we can do is cut greenhouse gas emissions. “Minimising the rate and extent of climate change will reduce the amount of action required,” says Thomas.

Audobon Society Statement on Birds and Wind Power:

On balance, Audubon strongly supports wind power as a clean alternative energy source that reduces the threat of global warming. Location, however, is important. Many National Audubon Society Chapters and State Programs are actively involved in wind-power siting issues in their communities. Each project has a unique set of circumstances and should be evaluated on its own merits.

In Massachusetts, Mass Audubon (which is an independent state Audubon organization) recently completed an extensive review of the proposed Cape Wind project on Nantucket Sound that set a new standard for analyzing the potential effects of wind turbines on birds.

Every source of energy has some environmental consequences. Most of today’s rapidly growing demand for energy is now being met by natural gas and expanded coal-burning power plants, which are this country’s single greatest source of the greenhouse-gas emissions that cause global warming. If we don’t find ways to reduce these emissions, far more birds—and people—will be threatened by global warming than by wind turbines. Our challenge is thus to help design and locate wind-power projects that minimize the negative impacts on birds.

 

About these ads

7 Responses to “Birds in Crosshairs of Climate Extinction”

  1. Jean Mcmahon Says:

    Audubon drives me nuts..never mention Global warming ,except very obliquely (locally)

  2. Jean Mcmahon Says:

    I cannot help feeling”Go Birds”…great segment

  3. rayduray Says:

    Sibley’s Guides has a nice chart on bird mortality due to human causes.

    http://www.sibleyguides.com/conservation/causes-of-bird-mortality/

    The takeaway point is that wind turbines are the least of our worries when it comes to bird mortality.

    See also this US Forest Service Study:

    http://tinyurl.com/22dfdl

    Highlights in the study include the percentage of human caused bird deaths by cause:

    Buildings (glass, etc.) 58%
    Power Lines: 13%
    Cats: 10%

    WIND TURBINES: Less than 0.01%


  4. […] 2013/06/17: PSinclair: Birds in Crosshairs of Climate Extinction […]


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,659 other followers

%d bloggers like this: